Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Class\s+for\s+PT\s+Cruiser\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Class\s+for\s+PT\s+Cruiser\?\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Class for PT Cruiser? (score: 1): Author: "Darren P. Madams" <darren@madams.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 08:54:12 -0700; Got to test drive one this weekend. Just checked the online FastTrack and didn't see anything about it. Has it been classed yet, or is it in the works? Andy??? :) My opinion... DS for now, ES next ye; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01493.html (9,021 bytes)
2. Re: Class for PT Cruiser? (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 13:46:47 EDT; << Just checked the online FastTrack and didn't see anything about it. Has it been classed yet, or is it in the works? Andy??? :) >> U/Stock.... For "Upside down." CHD; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01505.html (7,383 bytes)
3. Re: Class for PT Cruiser? (score: 1): Author: "Paul Foster" <pfoster@gdi.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 19:41:42 -0400; <<<U/Stock.... For "Upside down.">>> BUS for Butt Ugly Stock? Paul Foster; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01536.html (7,241 bytes)
4. Re: Class for PT Cruiser? (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 19:48:17 -0500; == No. I saw the new "world's ugliest vehicle" yesterday. I don't know what in the heck the designers at Pontiac are smoking these days but that new Aztec is positively painfully ugly. I cringed so; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01541.html (8,087 bytes)
5. Re: Class for PT Cruiser? (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 21:07:49 EDT; << I don't know what in the heck the designers at Pontiac are smoking these days but that new Aztec is positively painfully ugly. I cringed so hard that my cheeks cramped up and tears squeezed out of; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01544.html (7,441 bytes)
6. re: Class for PT Cruiser? (score: 1): Author: "Cliff Loh" <cliff_loh@infoserve.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 20:10:59 -0700; Has it Would it be legal to run it with the rear seats removed since they are designed to do so? Is it the same 'removable item' as a t-top or targa roof? We'd be talking a lot of weight here. -c. --; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01549.html (8,174 bytes)
7. Re: Class for PT Cruiser? (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 23:26:11 -0500; I think a PT Cruiser would be a really nifty streeter. As an autocross car, it would be a really bad idea. The center-of-mass-height to wheel-track ratio is all wrong. Application of a several severa; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01552.html (8,003 bytes)
8. Re: Class for PT Cruiser? (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 23:28:20 -0500; Oh, yeah. They think this thing is going to compete with the PT Cruiser. As if. Phil Ethier Saint Paul Minnesota USA 1970 Lotus Europa, 1992 Saturn SL2, 1986 Chev Suburban LOON, MAC pethier@isd.net h; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01553.html (7,727 bytes)
9. Re: Class for PT Cruiser? (score: 1): Author: "Phil Ethier" <pethier@isd.net>; Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 23:29:37 -0500; Sure. Whatever it says in the owners manual. Won't make it into a sports car, though. Phil Ethier Saint Paul Minnesota USA 1970 Lotus Europa, 1992 Saturn SL2, 1986 Chev Suburban LOON, MAC pethier@isd; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01554.html (7,707 bytes)
10. Re: Class for PT Cruiser? (score: 1): Author: "David Hedderick" <davebs14@flash.net>; Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 02:35:11 -0500; Have you seen that Honda EV1 before? YIKES!!! IMHO it's just as ugly. They had one in front of the Honda Dealer in Houston last month. There is even a professor here at UTA who has one. It's a kind o; /html/autox/2000-07/msg01560.html (8,883 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]