Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Classic\s+Category\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Classic\s+Category\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. Classic Category (score: 1): Author: "Dan" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2003 05:39:49 -0800; When the "new" Classic Class was introduced last year, the first year was to be a "trial" period. What is the current status of the class for this year? Is it now permanent? ** Elon & list, The Class; /html/land-speed/2003-01/msg01182.html (7,177 bytes)
2. Fw: Classic Category (score: 1): Author: "James Tone" <gmc6power@earthlink.net>; Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 17:09:54 -0700; them, Tom the ford /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive/land-speed /// what; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00007.html (9,305 bytes)
3. Re: Classic Category (score: 1): Author: W S Potter <wester6935@attbi.com>; Date: Sun, 01 Sep 2002 18:49:06 -0700; I remember stories of some local racers going to the salt with a Ford flathead powered Dodge Dart. They were sent home because the car "wasn't in the spirit" of the rules. That was many years back an; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00009.html (9,761 bytes)
4. Classic category (score: 1): Author: "Parks, David" <David.Parks@lfr.com>; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 18:25:00 -0700; More fodder from an UNOFFICIAL source. Having been somewhat of a party to much of the discussion during formation of the new Classic Category, let me give you my take on the subject. Somewhere in the; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00285.html (12,721 bytes)
5. Re: Classic category (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 22:13:17 -0500; Classic category Dave that is a Great Dissertation on the Classic category and should be forwarded to the board for discussion..... I think this is a great place to discuss the merits of the class...; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00288.html (7,494 bytes)
6. Re: Classic category (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 12:51:39 EDT; << You can be sure that the SCTA Board will be discussing it, and I assume that interested parties will get copies of the SCTA "Petition for Rule Change or Clarification" form and turn in their sugge; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00301.html (7,298 bytes)
7. Re: Classic category (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2002 13:15:42 -0400; That is a good idea but everyone has a different work shop. Can i run EFI if I build it in my workshop or data acq as long as i build it, if so I am in .. LOL everyone has a different workshop with d; /html/land-speed/2002-09/msg00302.html (6,890 bytes)
8. Classic Category (score: 1): Author: "Ken Smith" <ksmith6@mindspring.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 14:51:45 -0600; Let me preface this by saying I don't have a car that relates to this category. I have friends that do, and these were a few questions that came to mind as we looked at it: 1. When the records were m; /html/land-speed/2002-08/msg00544.html (7,662 bytes)
9. Re: Classic Category (score: 1): Author: "landspeedracer" <landspeedracer@msn.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 19:54:27 -0400; I DIDN'T HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH THIS NEW CATEGORY, ACTUALLY NOT EVEN A FAN OF THIS CATEGORY WITH IT'S CURRENT GUIDELINES, BUT MY OBSERVATIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS: to car moved THE CLASSIC CLASS CRITERI; /html/land-speed/2002-08/msg00546.html (8,655 bytes)
10. Re: Classic Category (score: 1): Author: "Ken Smith" <ksmith6@mindspring.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 18:08:46 -0600; Let me clarify this question: The intro states that the classic category is made for the "golden era" of cars such as 40-50 Fords and Mercs. For one of these cars to run in ClassicProduction, they ne; /html/land-speed/2002-08/msg00547.html (7,620 bytes)
11. Re: Classic Category (score: 1): Author: "landspeedracer" <landspeedracer@msn.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 22:33:56 -0400; Well for whatever reason SCTA chose not to include XF and XO engines in the classic category (don't know why) so I suppose they either run in /PRO (where they are legal) or E , D/CPRO. John is of car; /html/land-speed/2002-08/msg00551.html (8,253 bytes)
12. Re: Classic Category (score: 1): Author: "Ken Smith" <ksmith6@mindspring.com>; Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2002 21:09:09 -0600; That's what I came up with. Don't know the reason either. the /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majordomo@autox.team.net or try /// http://www.team.net/mailman/listinfo /// Archives at http:; /html/land-speed/2002-08/msg00553.html (7,227 bytes)
13. Classic category (score: 1): Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 10:07:04 -0700; Thanks, but 'Classic'? I have the 2001 rule-book but I can't see any ref. to ** ** The Classic Category is new for 2002. Basics include '49 - '81 AMERICAN coupes and sedans, no EFI, limited body and; /html/land-speed/2001-09/msg00566.html (7,530 bytes)
14. Re: Classic category (score: 1): Author: Rick Hammond <r.hammond@sympatico.ca>; Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 13:40:55 -0400; Dan, Oh Great,...now the '48 is too OLD? ;-) Where can I get details? eg. will it cover altered class, as mine would be D/GALT with the '64 Buick 300 V8 with the stock '48 Pontiac body. Thanks for th; /html/land-speed/2001-09/msg00569.html (7,879 bytes)
15. Classic category (score: 1): Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 04:39:28 -0700; Oh Great,...now the '48 is too OLD? ** Rick, '48 isn't old, just Vintage. If you forward your address I can mail a copy of the rules and proposed records to you. You can also use the list quest optio; /html/land-speed/2001-09/msg00609.html (7,274 bytes)
16. Re: Classic category (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 07:07:18 -0700 (PDT); did not include all of the converted records, just the part that pertains to the cars. CLASSIC CATEGORY This category encompasses American coupes and sedans produced between 1949 and 1981 at a rate; /html/land-speed/2001-09/msg00616.html (10,000 bytes)
17. Classic category (score: 1): Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 08:14:07 -0700; , Here is a copy of the category rules. I did not include all of the converted records, just the part that pertains to the cars. ** Thanks Dick, The records are still pending as there is one more mee; /html/land-speed/2001-09/msg00620.html (7,392 bytes)
18. Re: Classic category (score: 1): Author: Rick Hammond <r.hammond@sympatico.ca>; Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2001 11:55:25 -0400; Thanks Dick, So I guess the first question is; could a '48 that is not eligible for Vintage (D/VGALT) because of having an OHV V8 run in Classic? (D/CGALT) The second question is re the 'forever' rul; /html/land-speed/2001-09/msg00626.html (10,183 bytes)
19. Classic Category (score: 1): Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 06:35:19 -0700; I just finished proof reading the pre-entries for Speedweek and decided to count how many of these entries would be in the Classic Category classes if they were now in place. Of a total of 37 entrie; /html/land-speed/2001-07/msg00123.html (7,105 bytes)
20. Classic category (score: 1): Author: "Dan Warner" <dwarner@electrorent.com>; Date: Fri, 6 Jul 2001 08:21:48 -0700; I sure hope to have it at B'Ville next year. ** Dick & list, The category is a done deal for 2002. See an earlier post for rules and current record list. Dan W /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net maili; /html/land-speed/2001-07/msg00128.html (6,656 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]