- 1. Classifying List Subscribers (score: 1)
- Author: Malcolm Pittwood <MPittwood@compuserve.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 14:39:09 -0500
- Who would dare write the RULES of classification for "racers vs Wanabees" on this list ? I thought all who subscribe would have a fondness for land speed records and racing. Period. So does it matter
- /html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00258.html (7,089 bytes)
- 2. Re: Classifying List Subscribers (score: 1)
- Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 12:34:30 -0600
- And Malcom I agree.... This list is about Land Speed Racing.... Lots of us are wanna be's and some of us are lucky enough to race.. there is room for us All here. Keith.... -- land individual
- /html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00259.html (7,542 bytes)
- 3. Re: Classifying List Subscribers (score: 1)
- Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rapidnet.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 12:22:08 -0700
- Malcom, this list means much more to me to include the "whatevers" and the "whatevers", I want to hear especially from people abroad, that is what makes the internet so enjoyable to me, to broaden my
- /html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00260.html (8,013 bytes)
- 4. Re: Classifying List Subscribers (score: 1)
- Author: "Lawrence E. & Cathy R. Mayfield" <lemay@hiwaay.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2000 01:27:01
- Ah, when I posted the request to classify the list members I had no thought of the direction in which it has gone...I was hoping that we could classify ourselves as to old geezer, geezer, old fart, ,
- /html/land-speed/2000-03/msg00261.html (7,896 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu