Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Classing\s+Cessna\s+152\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Classing\s+Cessna\s+152\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Classing Cessna 152 (score: 1): Author: "Racer---X" <Racer---X@email.msn.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 02:44:48 -0500; Actually, the 152 (like all aircraft) is classed in FStock, 'cause that puppy will really fly!!! Michael Karp; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01113.html (7,247 bytes)
2. Re: Classing Cessna 152 (score: 1): Author: Dale Thomas <dthomas@gv.net>; Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 00:13:02 -0800; But what if it has updated avionics? would that move it to AP? as in "air prepared"? :-) Dale; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01114.html (7,328 bytes)
3. Classing Cessna 152 (score: 1): Author: "George Ryan" <quad4fiero@webzone.net>; Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 04:29:51 -0600; In reality, I think it would be the same as my old straight tail 150 - - A Mod. Open wheeled, and lots of wing!! Congratulations, Pax! George; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01117.html (7,692 bytes)
4. Re: Classing Cessna 152 (score: 1): Author: Mike Bultemeier <hottvr@tfs.net>; Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 10:01:33 -0600; My dad had a Mooney MK21D some years back and also an M model Bonanza that we called "The Banana boat" Now those were A-Mod. Mike B.; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01122.html (8,021 bytes)
5. Re: Classing Cessna 152 (score: 1): Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>; Date: Sat, 20 Feb 1999 15:16:01 -0500; Not much time in a 152, eh? These are the fixed-wing cousins to helicopters -- they just generate enough noise and vibration to fool the air into thinking they're flying. Jamie '92 Prelude Si (more p; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01128.html (7,891 bytes)
6. Classing Cessna 152 (score: 1): Author: Kenneth Allan Mitchell <nokones@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 06:52:24 -0800; Did Cessna produce/sell a thousand of the 152's in the US?? If not it is not a legal model to compete. European and Canada sales do not count. I don't think the avionics package should have anything; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01147.html (7,891 bytes)
7. Re: Classing Cessna 152 (score: 1): Author: "Jamie Sculerati" <jamies@mrj.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 12:05:37 -0500; It's been awhile, but yes, they did. Could be a factor if the pilot programs the course into the nav system. Guess the SEB will have to outlaw walking the course with hand-held GPS units. Cessna 152?; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01149.html (8,337 bytes)
8. Re: Classing Cessna 152 (score: 1): Author: Hottvr@aol.com; Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 20:25:01 EST; STOL Kit?(No response required) I know what it means. The ? is has the engine been uprated? If so its in D-Mod because of the weight limit. Ha Mike B.; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01154.html (7,177 bytes)
9. Re: Classing Cessna 152 (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 20:32:01 EST; << STOL Kit?(No response required) I know what it means. The ? is has the engine been uprated? If so its in D-Mod because of the weight limit. >> If it's all supplied by Cessna, then it's update-back; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01155.html (7,523 bytes)
10. Re: Classing Cessna 152 (score: 1): Author: Kenneth Allan Mitchell <nokones@ix.netcom.com>; Date: Sun, 21 Feb 1999 19:46:09 -0800; Hmmm - "D" Mod??? I thought wings were no longer allowed in "D" Mod. -- Kenneth Allan Mitchell mailto:nokones@ix.netcom.com; /html/autox/1999-02/msg01160.html (7,506 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]