Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Clutch\s+install\s+78\s+MGB\s+$\"bang\s+for\s+buck\"\s+mods\.$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Clutch\s+install\s+78\s+MGB\s+$\"bang\s+for\s+buck\"\s+mods\.$\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Clutch install 78 MGB ("bang for buck" mods.) (score: 1): Author: "Eric J Russell" <ejrussell@mebtel.net>; Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2004 20:55:12 -0500; -- Original Message -- IMO, the best "bang for the buck" is the dual SU's & stock exhaust manifold that goes with the SU intake manifold. Webers may get bragging points but you'll not win the "bang f; /html/mgs/2004-02/msg00013.html (7,997 bytes)
2. Re: Clutch install 78 MGB ("bang for buck" mods.) (score: 1): Author: Rocky Frisco <rock@rocky-frisco.com>; Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 00:49:45 -0600; I have been building MOWOG 4-cylinder street/track engines for my own projects since 1964. I like 1275's with about 9/1 compression, single HIF6 SU with upgraded needles and dashpot springs, APT/Viza; /html/mgs/2004-02/msg00015.html (9,284 bytes)
3. Re: Clutch install 78 MGB ("bang for buck" mods.) (score: 1): Author: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 20:16:52 -0600; Listen to the man, boys and girls. He's telling you what God loves. CR; /html/mgs/2004-02/msg00025.html (7,716 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]