- 1. Combustion theory (score: 1)
- Author: William Eastman <william.eastman@medtronic.com>
- Date: Fri, 01 Nov 1996 12:45:20 -0600
- I have read a lot of questions on ignition system performance both here and on the MGA BBS. Since I spent a goodly portion of the sober moments of my college career studying internal combustion theor
- /html/mgs/1996-11/msg00017.html (12,693 bytes)
- 2. Re: Combustion theory (score: 1)
- Author: edward <engconn@pottsville.infi.net>
- Date: Sat, 02 Nov 1996 10:43:55 -0500
- That was a truly excellent example of how the internet should properly be used. Thank you. Geoff Love, The English Connection Geoff Love, The English Connection
- /html/mgs/1996-11/msg00044.html (14,185 bytes)
- 3. Combustion Theory (score: 1)
- Author: Simon.MATTHEWS@st.com
- Date: Mon, 4 Nov 96 09:49:08 +0100
- William Eastman wrote an excellent article on this. However, there are a couple of additional points that should be made: Valve Overlap -- all other things equal, minimal valve overlap would be good,
- /html/mgs/1996-11/msg00136.html (7,462 bytes)
- 4. Re: Combustion Theory (score: 1)
- Author: Ulix Goettsch <ulix@u.washington.edu>
- Date: Tue, 5 Nov 1996 13:23:47 -0800 (PST)
- I want to go a little more into detail here. Valve overlap really comes into play at high rpms, and it is necessary because of the inertia of the fuel/air mixture. Without overlap, the intake valve o
- /html/mgs/1996-11/msg00247.html (9,520 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu