Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Converting\s+a\s+260\s+to\s+a\s+302\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Converting\s+a\s+260\s+to\s+a\s+302\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. Converting a 260 to a 302 (score: 1): Author: "Holt, Jeff" <jeff.holt@gs.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 11:33:10 -0400; Could someone briefly outline the steps necessary to change the 260 to a Is it worth it or should I just get a different engine altogether? Isn't the block the same (or are the later versions of the; /html/tigers/2005-06/msg00089.html (7,653 bytes)
2. RE: Converting a 260 to a 302 (score: 1): Author: "Theo Smit" <theo.smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 09:53:27 -0600; To change the displacement, you need the 302 crank (with the larger stroke), and then you'd have to bore the block to accept the larger-diameter 302 pistons. The problem with that is it can't be done; /html/tigers/2005-06/msg00090.html (8,848 bytes)
3. Re: Converting a 260 to a 302 (score: 1): Author: Jim Sencindiver <jd.sencindiver@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 11:57:07 -0400; The max cylinder overbore for the 260 is .030 inch. The 260 cylinder diameter is 3.8 inches, while the 289 and 302 have a cylinder diameter of 4.0 inches (IIRC!), so you can't change a 260 into a 30; /html/tigers/2005-06/msg00091.html (8,476 bytes)
4. Re: Converting a 260 to a 302 (score: 1): Author: <arado7@sbcglobal.net>; Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 12:55:38 -0400; Strange how things go. I am in the process of removing the four barrel manifold and returning to stock 260. I have located the parts to do so from a drive train long removed for a 302. Regards, Gary; /html/tigers/2005-06/msg00096.html (7,573 bytes)
5. RE: Converting a 260 to a 302 (score: 1): Author: "Theo Smit" <theo.smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 11:19:37 -0600; Well you know what they say - different strokes for different folks. 8-) Sourcing original Tiger bits and 260 parts is considerably harder than getting performance pieces, so while I'm not interested; /html/tigers/2005-06/msg00097.html (8,400 bytes)
6. RE: Converting a 260 to a 302 (score: 1): Author: " Ron Fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.biz>; Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 15:14:20 -0400; You could put any of the stroker kits into the 260 and get into the 330 cu in range, but your limited by the 260 bore size. Any other part that fits a 289 or 302 will work. The real question is how; /html/tigers/2005-06/msg00104.html (8,990 bytes)
7. Re: Converting a 260 to a 302 (score: 1): Author: "Bob Hokanson" <tgrrr@peoplepc.com>; Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 19:02:45 -0700; Gee, well now why would you want to do that? Shelby, himself thought enough of the 260 that he recommended that Rootes keep it in the LeMans cars. :-); /html/tigers/2005-06/msg00107.html (7,861 bytes)
8. Re: Converting a 260 to a 302 (score: 1): Author: DJoh797014@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:40:07 EDT; According to 'Rebuilding the Small Block Ford' and other books, for changed the casting molds for the 289's. If you try boring a 260 much more the .030 over the adds are very great, you will break t; /html/tigers/2005-06/msg00118.html (7,873 bytes)
9. Re: Converting a 260 to a 302 (score: 1): Author: DJoh797014@aol.com; Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2005 23:50:38 EDT; This is the same Shelby who after observing that the LeMans Tiger was almost as fast as his 289 Cobras, has his mechanics rebuild the 260's after qualifications for Rootes. Interesting both suffered; /html/tigers/2005-06/msg00119.html (7,853 bytes)
10. Re: Converting a 260 to a 302 (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:24:18 -0700; Dave and List, While original factory manuals have been known to be incorrect, it is worthwhile, here, to check what Rootes (and Ford) had to say about re-bore limitations. CYLINDER BLOCK '260' '289"; /html/tigers/2005-06/msg00122.html (9,089 bytes)
11. Re: Converting a 260 to a 302 (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 10:49:11 -0700; Sorry the text alignment did not process the e-mail as written. Here is the meaningful alignment: ___ Steve Laifman Editor - TigersUnited.com --; /html/tigers/2005-06/msg00123.html (8,296 bytes)
12. Re: Converting a 260 to a 302 (score: 1): Author: Drmoonstone@aol.com; Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2005 20:00:49 EDT; I do have two five bolt 289's. One might be available contact me off the Moonstone; /html/tigers/2005-06/msg00126.html (7,349 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]