Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Convex\s+vs\.\s+Plain\s+Mirrors\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Convex\s+vs\.\s+Plain\s+Mirrors\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Convex vs. Plain Mirrors (score: 1): Author: "Chris Boston" <cboston@zeu.tt.umist.ac.uk>; Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 10:52:34 +0000; I want to replace my aging door mirrors, but all the catalogues offer a choice of either plain or convex glass, which should I choose? I realise that a convex mirror will give me a larger field of vi; /html/triumphs/1996-03/msg00187.html (6,939 bytes)
2. RE: Convex vs. Plain Mirrors (score: 1): Author: dan parslow <DJP@ALPHA.SUNQUEST.COM>; Date: Fri, 08 Mar 1996 09:25:20 -0700; Chris, I would recommend flat for door mirrors, and convex for wing mirrors. Here in the US we have this stupid law that requires A) convex passengerside door mirrors to increase field of view, and B; /html/triumphs/1996-03/msg00193.html (7,564 bytes)
3. RE: Convex vs. Plain Mirrors (score: 1): Author: "Carl Musson (EVENTS)" <musson@satie.arts.usf.edu>; Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 11:48:39 -0500 (EST); I did some checking about the convex question. I was told by the Fla Dept Motor Vehicles that standard equipment on vintage vehicles are grandfathered in and there is no requirement to change the equ; /html/triumphs/1996-03/msg00194.html (8,535 bytes)
4. Re: Convex vs. Plain Mirrors (score: 1): Author: TR6Massey@aol.com; Date: Fri, 8 Mar 1996 18:55:15 -0500; Chris: I think the plain vs convex mirrors choise (sp?) is one of personal preference. I like a flat mirror on the driver's side and a convex (slight convex, not a fish-eye) on the passenger side. Pu; /html/triumphs/1996-03/msg00201.html (6,902 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]