- 1. Copied to death on Team.net? (score: 1)
- Author: TeamZ3@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 17:55:15 EST
- Is it just me, or is anyone else now getting THREE copies of a reply post sent to yourself and Team.net. Two copies was already one too many IMO. My index finger is suffering from delete-syndrome. M
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00679.html (6,789 bytes)
- 2. Re: Copied to death on Team.net? (score: 1)
- Author: "Phillip S. Osborne" <psosborn@gte.net>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 17:58:12 -0500
- At the risk of breaking net etiquette, ME TOO! Phil O sent
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00683.html (7,029 bytes)
- 3. Re: Copied to death on Team.net? (score: 1)
- Author: John Lieberman <johnlee@softdisk.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 19:07:41 -0800
- I can't explain three, Mark, unless you cc'd the original message to yourself. And I see that you didn't do that on this message. However, two is easy to understand. If the respondent hits "Reply All
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00684.html (7,629 bytes)
- 4. Re: Copied to death on Team.net? (score: 1)
- Author: "Mark J. Andy" <marka@telerama.com>
- Date: Sat, 16 Jan 1999 13:40:32 -0500 (EST)
- Breaking net etiquette? Man. Am I the only one that remembers when that term meant to NOT do things like send responses to the list and the original sender? And to trim down the quoted part of the m
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00693.html (7,237 bytes)
- 5. Re: Copied to death on Team.net? (score: 1)
- Author: Walter Fooshee <wfooshee@csi.com>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jan 1999 22:29:35 -0600
- When I reply, I take the extra 3 seconds to make the list the only addressee. I don't know if that breaks up threads or not, but the subject carries. I thought that would be a nice courtesy to those
- /html/autox/1999-01/msg00720.html (7,805 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu