Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cops\s+vs\.LBCs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cops\s+vs\.LBCs\s*$/: 25 ]

Total 25 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: "Maynard Hirsch" <mghirsch@netzero.net>; Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 21:51:32 -0500; The problem with cops is when they are used primarily to enhance revenues for their government agency instead of trying to make the roads and communities safer. Maynard /// or try http://www.team.net; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00683.html (7,809 bytes)
2. RE: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: Chuck Renner <crenner@dynalivery.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 12:31:01 -0500; You'll see this in action if you ever make a plea deal on a traffic ticket. If I get caught speeding, I get caught speeding. Yes, the limits may be set artificially low, etc., but when I get nailed; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00728.html (8,747 bytes)
3. Re: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:28:48 -0500; What I gather from your posts is that you don't see committing a misdemeanor as a violation of the law. Where does it stop with you? CR /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives a; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00730.html (7,631 bytes)
4. RE: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: Chuck Renner <crenner@dynalivery.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:43:59 -0500; Getting way off topic here.... I specifically stated that if I get caught speeding, I freely admit to it. There's a law, I violated it, I got caught, and I deal with the consequences of it within th; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00733.html (8,249 bytes)
5. Re: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: "Rick Lindsay" <ROLindsay@Emeraldgrc.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:47:24 -0500; While at summer camp, Chuck wrote -- and I agree, generally, On this count, I have to <mildly> question "...artificially low..." because we, the motorsport-enjoying-minority, make up such a tiny frac; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00735.html (9,995 bytes)
6. Re: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: "Rick Lindsay" <ROLindsay@Emeraldgrc.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:56:59 -0500; CR, I read his post differently. I read it to say that his actions are HIS and if he chooses to break the law -- and gets caught -- then he is willing to pay the price for his actions. I respect tha; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00736.html (8,854 bytes)
7. RE: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: Chuck Renner <crenner@dynalivery.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:06:02 -0500; By 'artificially low' I mean that most speed limits are set in an arbitrary fashion. A well done federal study showed that speed limits should be set to the 85th percentile speed. You knock off the; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00737.html (11,082 bytes)
8. RE: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 12:14:18 -0700 (PDT); In NJ, speed limits on ALL roads are set by the State DOT. We had an interesting issue with the main road through our development - state requirements would have set the speed limit at 40 mph - this; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00738.html (8,738 bytes)
9. Re: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: "Rick Lindsay" <ROLindsay@Emeraldgrc.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:19:58 -0500; It would be interesting to see if anyone gets a ticket for going 40 in a 25 and how the city would prosecute it -- seeing as how the signs are invalid. Cool idea though -- and I agree with the idea; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00739.html (8,472 bytes)
10. Re: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: "David Breneman" <idcb@airborne.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 12:27:44 -0700 (PDT); Rick Lindsay SEZ - (deletions...) Studies have been done with a lot more statistical rigor than I can remember or recite here, but they usually boil down to this: If you take the speed limit signs of; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00740.html (10,635 bytes)
11. Re: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: "Rick Lindsay" <ROLindsay@Emeraldgrc.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:42:29 -0500; In geophysics -- a science whose data is frequently contaminated with noise -- we frequently use what is called an 'alpha trim mean', especially in data scaling. In that case, the 'alpha' parameter; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00742.html (9,387 bytes)
12. RE: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: Chuck Renner <crenner@dynalivery.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:47:20 -0500; In the case of red light cameras, I don't think the insurance industry is putting any money into them. Photo radar may be a different story. The red light cameras are usually a partnership between t; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00743.html (9,697 bytes)
13. Re: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: Dan DiBiase <d_dibiase@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 13:18:01 -0700 (PDT); Well, when the police have brought in their radar trailer (you know, the one with the big digital speedometer) the sign above the readout always says 25 mph, so they've bought it! Who knows, maybe th; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00748.html (9,212 bytes)
14. Re: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: "Mike Janacek" <mjanacek@snet.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 16:58:06 -0400; Speaking of GEICO, has anyone seen their commercial which features the Gecko in some sort of LBC (similar to a MGA)? Usually on Fox news (cable) here in CT. When I first got my B two years ago they w; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00750.html (10,378 bytes)
15. Re: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: Stephen West-Fisher <steve@coastaldatasystems.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 17:31:31 -0400; Interesting argument, except if you don't break the law, you don't get caught, so you are not a victim. How many people are hurt each year due to someone else loosing control of their vehicle due to; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00751.html (9,480 bytes)
16. Re: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: "David Breneman" <idcb@airborne.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 14:57:21 -0700 (PDT); Stephen West-Fisher SEZ - The whole point of my message was that the laws are intentionally parasitic. There is no nobility in being a sucker, whether that's the law or not. Exactly. Those are the ty; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00752.html (9,243 bytes)
17. Re: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 15:40:34 -0700; Yeah, you start thinkin' that, then you get to an off-camber, blind, 6% grade downhill hairpin, and some joker has signed it 35, just like the last two curves... it's like they ran out of 20 MPH sign; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00754.html (8,772 bytes)
18. Re: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: Ajhsys@aol.com; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 10:38:00 EDT; - - - - - - - - - In the instance of "red light cameras," they are shortening the length of the yellow light so that they catch more people going thru on red. Now that isn't fair. And they have found; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00779.html (9,550 bytes)
19. Re: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:41:00 -0500; <<<snip>>> 'alpha trim mean' <<<snip>>> That sounds very much like the standard deviation we used in college physics. That is, data more than 3 SD's from the mean was considered out of the norm. Tha; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00807.html (8,141 bytes)
20. Re: Cops vs.LBCs (score: 1): Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>; Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 21:48:41 -0500; Remember all: One half of the people in this world have below standard IQ's along with below standard driving skills. So 50% of all people on the road don't think like us. Blake /// or try http://www; /html/mgs/2002-08/msg00808.html (7,855 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]