Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cu\s+in\s+Vs\.\s+Technology\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cu\s+in\s+Vs\.\s+Technology\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Cu in Vs. Technology (score: 1): Author: Richard Gosling <rbgos@perkins-engines.com>; Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2000 16:13:39 +0000; Just adding my little input to the cubic inches arguement. Compare and Lotus Esprit GT3 - 240 bhp, 182 bhp/ton, out of a 1973 cc 4-cyl engine (120 cu in). And that's without having to rev to 9000 rpm; /html/spitfires/2000-01/msg00142.html (7,810 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]