Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cv\s+joints\s+vs\.rotoflex\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Cv\s+joints\s+vs\.rotoflex\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Cv joints vs.rotoflex? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:31:22 -0400; Joe, I hear your support for the CV joints, but where does one source such an Steve; /html/triumphs/2003-09/msg00763.html (6,343 bytes)
2. RE: Cv joints vs.rotoflex? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 13:55:03 -0700; **CAUTION, COMMERCIAL MESSAGE FOLLOWS** Steve, The commercial message is for Clive Averill, not me. I purchased his upgrade which included the modified axles, CV joints, and adjustable aluminum contr; /html/triumphs/2003-09/msg00765.html (7,383 bytes)
3. Re: Cv joints vs.rotoflex? (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 18:26:51 EDT; OK, so what was the total for the original conversion (and, for those interested in really strong axles, the custom inner axles)? And what do good quality roto-flex couplings go for? --Andy Mace; /html/triumphs/2003-09/msg00773.html (6,594 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]