Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DCOE\s+v\s+SU\,\s+was\s+Re\:\s+1\.5\"\s+SUs\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DCOE\s+v\s+SU\,\s+was\s+Re\:\s+1\.5\"\s+SUs\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. DCOE v SU, was Re: 1.5" SUs (score: 1): Author: Daniel1312@aol.com; Date: Mon, 9 Nov 1998 16:41:42 EST; Hi Martyn, Scott, list, The engine in my car is a 1275 (1312) and I have run a single back box RC40 on it for years. It is a little noisy - because RC40s become less effective at the higher power oup; /html/spridgets/1998-11/msg00288.html (8,815 bytes)
2. Re: DCOE v SU, was Re: 1.5" SUs (score: 1): Author: Frank Clarici <spritenut@Exit109.com>; Date: Mon, 09 Nov 1998 21:05:28 -0500; 1.75 SU vs 45 DCOE Weber. I have both carbs. But not on the same state of tune 1275s. I can tell you that a 1.75 SU is far superior to a down draft Weber. But as for the same state of tune 1275s, I h; /html/spridgets/1998-11/msg00297.html (8,353 bytes)
3. Re: DCOE v SU, was Re: 1.5" SUs (score: 1): Author: "Mike Gigante" <mikeg@vicnet.net.au>; Date: Tue, 10 Nov 1998 14:26:58 -0800; I'm in the opposite situation. My rally bugeye's 1380 had a DCOE45 before I pulled the engine for a temporary race engine. When the 1380 goes back in (in a few weeks) it will have the HIF6 on a reall; /html/spridgets/1998-11/msg00301.html (9,374 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]