Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DOT\s+5\s+vs\s+other\s+brake\s+fluids\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DOT\s+5\s+vs\s+other\s+brake\s+fluids\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. DOT 5 vs other brake fluids (score: 1): Author: Sjhcobra1@cs.com; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 22:58:59 EDT; I've been running DOT 5 in one of my Tigers since 1998 and another since 2002 with no issues. These are both cars that get thousands of driving miles each year. What sorts of issues have others had w; /html/tigers/2007-06/msg00004.html (6,596 bytes)
2. RE: DOT 5 vs other brake fluids (score: 1): Author: "Robert Bridgeford" <bobbridgeford@msn.com>; Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 21:31:43 -0700; I ran DOT 5 for a year in a '78 Corvette that I did a complete brake replacement (rotors, calilpers, lines, master) and never got a very filrm petal. I finally went back to Dot 4 which cured the prob; /html/tigers/2007-06/msg00005.html (6,738 bytes)
3. RE: DOT 5 vs other brake fluids (score: 1): Author: "DERRICK SCHMIDT" <glowboy@starstream.net>; Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 21:44:14 -0700; DOT 5 is more compressible, somewhat "spongier" feel. If your not reallly the car hard, it is probably fine. It is lower maintenance and you don't have to worry about it's secondary function as a goo; /html/tigers/2007-06/msg00006.html (6,684 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]