Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DRL\'s\s+Warning\:\s+BIG\s+RANT\!\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DRL\'s\s+Warning\:\s+BIG\s+RANT\!\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. RE: DRL's Warning: BIG RANT! (score: 1): Author: "Eric Linnhoff" <eric10mm@qni.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 00:19:56 -0800; aftermarket safety item that could be purchased for about $15 that you hooked up into your motorcycle brake light. It would cause the brake light to flash whenever you triggerd the brake light via a; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00068.html (12,225 bytes)
2. Re: DRL's Warning: BIG RANT! (score: 1): Author: reddog_es22@juno.com; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 01:43:49 -0600; The coolest statistic I read about these has to do with the speed at which an LED lights up over an incadescent. The article I read (absolutely no idea where) said the difference was worth 17 feet at; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00072.html (7,987 bytes)
3. RE: DRL's Warning: BIG RANT! (score: 1): Author: "David Foss" <dfoss@recital.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 10:06:11 -0500; Let me get this right... You HATE that "Big Brother" mandates the third brake light and DRL, but you WANT him to mandate helmets for everyone?!?!? As far as I'm concerned let Darwin sort them all out; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00082.html (13,061 bytes)
4. Re: DRL's Warning: BIG RANT! (score: 1): Author: "Justin Hughes" <ka1ult@channel1.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 10:15:33 -0500; I can see why some might think they're better - flashing lights generally attract more attention than steady lights. That's why emergency vehicles light up like Christmas trees. But to me, part of t; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00083.html (11,253 bytes)
5. RE: DRL's Warning: BIG RANT! (score: 1): Author: "Wilson, Lindsay (L.S.)" <lwilson1@visteon.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 10:11:43 -0500; An interesting variant of the flashing CHMSL (center high mounted stop light) was experimented with on taxi cabs in San Francisco. The '3rd' light would increase flash frequency and intensity with br; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00088.html (13,322 bytes)
6. RE: DRL's Warning: BIG RANT! (score: 1): Author: bruce haden <bhaden@ucsd.edu>; Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 07:32:53 -0800; If you are already in the intersection in front of the oncoming car, the only thing a front brake light would do is tell you that you are about to be hit!! If you are NOT in the intersection, and you; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00091.html (9,087 bytes)
7. Re: DRL's Warning: BIG RANT! (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 12:39:03 EST; And, oh my yes! We need side brake lights too!! Of course we do!!! How else do we know what's on the mind of those people who are approaching intersections from our left and right????? Bruce (I've se; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00095.html (8,942 bytes)
8. Re: DRL's Warning: BIG RANT! (score: 1): Author: "Justin Hughes" <ka1ult@channel1.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 12:46:51 -0500; Let's just have the whole damn car flash like crazy whenever your foot goes anywhere near the brakes. That'll wake people up. :) - Justin; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00097.html (8,407 bytes)
9. Re: DRL's Warning: BIG RANT! (score: 1): Author: bruce haden <bhaden@ucsd.edu>; Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 09:31:08 -0800; Big problem...all the people who drive around with their foot on the brake ALL THE TIME. I followed one home yesterday. What a PITA.; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00098.html (8,211 bytes)
10. Re: DRL's Warning: BIG RANT! (score: 1): Author: "Justin Hughes" <ka1ult@channel1.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 13:07:09 -0500; <sarcasm> Hey, I think you've stumbled on the answer here... How about cars that have their brakes permanently engaged? That way they can't move, and if they can't move, nobody can crash, and nobody; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00101.html (8,404 bytes)
11. Re: DRL's Warning: BIG RANT! (score: 1): Author: Heyward K Wagner <sportscar48@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 13:22:06 EST; Fair enough, tell you what, next time an uninsured moron come in mangled from a accident where he was not wearing a seat belt, lets just shoot him in the head. That way my insurance company does not; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00104.html (15,637 bytes)
12. Re: DRL's Warning: BIG RANT! (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 13:25:58 EST; << Not to be a real PITA but, >> Well ..., how about knowing whether the PITA driving is going to brake for the upcoming red light, so you'll know whether to go on green or not???? Does that help you; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00105.html (8,365 bytes)
13. RE: DRL's Warning: BIG RANT! (score: 1): Author: Patrick Maddy <pmaddy@issiinc.com>; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 13:30:14 -0500; Fair enough, tell you what, next time an uninsured moron come in mangled from a accident where he was not wearing a seat belt, lets just shoot him in the head. <facetious> Great Idea! Natural Selecti; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00107.html (8,192 bytes)
14. Re: DRL's Warning: BIG RANT! (score: 1): Author: bruce haden <bhaden@ucsd.edu>; Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 10:42:08 -0800; I judge the above situation by watching the speed of the vehicle in question as it approaches the intersection. If the speed/distance equation doesn't look good for him stopping in time, I don't get; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00112.html (9,265 bytes)
15. Re: DRL's Warning: BIG RANT! (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 14:50:14 -0500; Let me stand up here publically and announce that I actually LIKE the CHMSL (third brake light). When in fairly heavy but moving traffic, they allow you to see the brake lights of the car five cars a; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00118.html (8,479 bytes)
16. Re: DRL's Warning: BIG RANT! (score: 1): Author: Mark Sirota <msirota@isc.upenn.edu>; Date: Thu, 02 Dec 1999 14:55:46 -0500; I've been saying since 1986 that common brake/turn filaments should be outlawed. Why did we add a third light, rather than at least requiring that all cars have two, even when they're signalling? As; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00119.html (8,519 bytes)
17. Re: DRL's Warning: BIG RANT! (score: 1): Author: MBD96@aol.com; Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1999 15:53:19 EST; << I judge the above situation by watching the speed of the vehicle in question as it approaches the intersection. If the speed/distance equation doesn't look good for him stopping in time, I don't g; /html/autox/1999-12/msg00123.html (8,337 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 17
Page: [1]