Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DSM\s+Update\/Backdate\s+was\:\s+Turbo\s+guys\s+get\s+screwed\s+again\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*DSM\s+Update\/Backdate\s+was\:\s+Turbo\s+guys\s+get\s+screwed\s+again\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. DSM Update/Backdate was: Turbo guys get screwed again (score: 1): Author: "Chan, Albert (GEP)" <Albert.Chan@gepex.ge.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 14:00:28 -0400; Okay Dennis. I've been an interested and amused lurker on this thread, until PHILOSOPHICAL QUESTION - Don't get caught up on what you have done or not done with regards to update/backdate - Why shoul; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00963.html (9,633 bytes)
2. Re: DSM Update/Backdate was: Turbo guys get screwed again (score: 1): Author: dg50@chrysler.com; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 14:46:55 -0400; Always happy to entertain.... ;) Well, even from a purely philosophical viewpoint, I don't think you can separate history from theory when it comes to update/backdate. No matter what one's opinion i; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00972.html (10,850 bytes)
3. Re: DSM Update/Backdate was: Turbo guys get screwed again (score: 1): Author: Josh Sirota <jss@marimba.com>; Date: Thu, 17 Jun 1999 16:27:56 -0400; Dennis, The chairman of the SEB, whose job is is to interpret the rules (kind of like the Supreme Court and the Constitution), says that this issue has never been ruled on in the past. Yet you say "D; /html/autox/1999-06/msg00986.html (8,113 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]