Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Dale\'s\s+Front\s+Antiroll\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Dale\'s\s+Front\s+Antiroll\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Dale's Front Antiroll (score: 1): Author: Veeseeoso@aol.com; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 12:14:07 EST; Hello all, Does anyone have images of Dale Akuszewski performance front antiroll bar setup for the Tiger? This setup places the bar's fulcrums directly on the front suspension cross member (rather th; /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00127.html (6,772 bytes)
2. Re: Dale's Front Antiroll (score: 1): Author: Theo Smit <tsmit@shaw.ca>; Date: Sun, 15 Dec 2002 14:15:27 -0700; That depends on what you mean by "proper". What's going to happen is the shocks will actually be required to do the damping they're designed to do, instead of having all the friction in the control a; /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00131.html (7,597 bytes)
3. re: Dale's Front Antiroll (score: 1): Author: "Stephen Waybright" <gswaybright@txucom.net>; Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 08:57:22 -0600; I have Dale's setup. First off... suspension binding is bad, bad, bad! It adds a ton of unpredictability that is contrary to the theoretical assumptions made when the engineers designed the component; /html/tigers/2002-12/msg00144.html (7,626 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]