Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Datsun\s+1600\/2000\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Datsun\s+1600\/2000\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Datsun 1600/2000 (score: 1): Author: "Richard Rivenbark" <rrivenbark@cfl.rr.com>; Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 21:23:04 -0400; BAH!!!! BAH, I say!! Tad 69 MGC GT 74 RWA Midget " Any of the Z engines would have been an improvement over what came in the MGC,from what I've heard." CR Check out the new British Cars Forum: http:/; /html/mgs/2004-09/msg00035.html (6,487 bytes)
2. Re: Datsun 1600/2000 (score: 1): Author: rfeibusch1@earthlink.net (Richard Feibusch); Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 20:43:50 -0700; As a former Datsun 1600SSS sedan and 1600 Roadster owner (mt brother had a 2000 roadster) I can enlighten the group with this: The "Fairlady" roadster was introduced a year ahead of the MGB and ther; /html/mgs/2004-08/msg00488.html (9,330 bytes)
3. Re: Datsun 1600/2000 (score: 1): Author: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 07:16:49 -0500; Mmmm, I had a '71 Datsun 1200 - also called the LB-110 - with the A-12 engine. That little engine was nothing like the MG 1800. It had all the flanges cast into the block - No plates on the ends IOW.; /html/mgs/2004-08/msg00494.html (9,403 bytes)
4. Re: Datsun 1600/2000 (score: 1): Author: rfeibusch1@earthlink.net (Richard Feibusch); Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 07:09:46 -0700; Charles, Maybe I did not make myself clear - The A-12 motor was similar to (but not interchangable with) and licensed to BMC with their smaller A-series 803 - 1275cc mill used in Austins and Morris; /html/mgs/2004-08/msg00495.html (7,371 bytes)
5. Re: Datsun 1600/2000 (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <ptroot@iaces.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 09:13:10 -0500; The L-16 was in the 510. My 510 actually had a transplanted L-18 from a 610 in it. Someone on this list (or maybe the Yahoo list) bought a MGC earlier this spring. And it had the Z (don't remember th; /html/mgs/2004-08/msg00496.html (10,325 bytes)
6. Re: Datsun 1600/2000 (score: 1): Author: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:56:32 -0500; Any of the Z engines would have been an improvement over what came in the MGC,from what I've heard. I'd like to see the installation you heard about. All the L series engines were slant types, rememb; /html/mgs/2004-08/msg00504.html (7,595 bytes)
7. Re: Datsun 1600/2000 (score: 1): Author: Paul Root <ptroot@iaces.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 18:30:54 -0500; Like I said, it was a guy that came on the list or the yahoo list, maybe in the spring. He'd never had an MG before, and actually thought he'd bought a B. A few email exchanges, we figured out that i; /html/mgs/2004-08/msg00505.html (8,557 bytes)
8. Re: Datsun 1600/2000 (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 17:10:55 -0700; I don't recall any such discussion on this list, FWIW. -- Max Heim '66 MGB GHN3L76149 If you're near Mountain View, CA, it's the primer red one with chrome wires Check out the new British Cars Forum:; /html/mgs/2004-08/msg00506.html (7,715 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]