Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Digital\s+cameras\s+$no\s+LBC$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Digital\s+cameras\s+$no\s+LBC$\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Digital cameras (no LBC) (score: 1): Author: Ajhsys@aol.com; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:46:17 EST; Some listers have posted questions abouut digital cameras in the past. I just got back from the Photo Marketing Association trade show and they always have a digital camera shoot-out to see what the; /html/mgs/2001-02/msg00782.html (8,967 bytes)
2. Re: Digital cameras (no LBC) (score: 1): Author: "R. O. Lindsay" <rolindsay@dgrc.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:22:47 -0600; I use the Olympus 500DL which is the older twin of the C-3040. I picked it because it is an SLR with a classical viewfinder (like a 35mm). The cameras with the LCD viewfinder <only> on the back look; /html/mgs/2001-02/msg00783.html (8,073 bytes)
3. Re: Digital cameras (no LBC) (score: 1): Author: Chris Thompson <ct@cthompson.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:49:05 -0500; All digital cameras are a tradeoff, until you get to pro models, which run several thousand dollars. The key points of a digital camera are, in no particular order: 1) Size and portability 2) Ruggedn; /html/mgs/2001-02/msg00785.html (11,752 bytes)
4. Re: Digital cameras (no LBC) (score: 1): Author: Chris Thompson <ct@cthompson.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:21:07 -0500; I forgot one thing. The camera has an incredible "ooooh" factor. Every time one of my friends (Geek and non Geek alike) see it, they all are seriously impressed :) And they think I'm kidding when I t; /html/mgs/2001-02/msg00786.html (7,948 bytes)
5. Re: Digital cameras (no LBC) (score: 1): Author: Lieb David B <dbl@vniles.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:26:17 -0600; All digital cameras are a tradeoff, until you get to pro models, which run several thousand dollars. The key points of a digital camera are, in no particular order: 1) Size and portability 2) Rugged; /html/mgs/2001-02/msg00789.html (9,593 bytes)
6. Re: Digital cameras (no LBC) (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 10:40:30 -0800; Just to add another viewpoint -- for a consumer level camera, I would look for one that uses standard AA batteries, and get Nickel Metal Hydride (NiMH) rechargeable batteries for it. These give very; /html/mgs/2001-02/msg00790.html (8,913 bytes)
7. Re: Digital cameras (no LBC) (score: 1): Author: Howard gentry <zymmer4@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 13:33:03 -0800 (PST); hello all, winners above are all good choices...i have the olympus..it is A Pearl !!! Howard; /html/mgs/2001-02/msg00797.html (10,106 bytes)
8. Re: Digital cameras (no LBC) (score: 1): Author: ATWEDITOR@aol.com; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 19:54:42 EST; I've been working with a Nikon Coolpix 990 (dorky name) at work, and it produces high quality shots. I still have operational "issues" with it, but I'm still blaming operator error rather than the ca; /html/mgs/2001-02/msg00802.html (7,515 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]