Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Disregard\s+for\s+Pollution\s+Control\s+Standards\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Disregard for Pollution Control Standards (score: 1)
Author: William Elliott <William.Elliott@mail.mei.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 13:54:45 -0500
<< Fact is that most of what one reads on this list is a total disregard for the importance of pollution control standards. It's as though the gov't was out to spoil our fun. Some of us need to grow
/html/mgs/1998-07/msg00701.html (8,792 bytes)

2. Re: Disregard for Pollution Control Standards (score: 1)
Author: Trevor Boicey <tboicey@brit.ca>
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 1998 21:59:20 -0400
This is logical for a lot of the emissions equipment, agreed. However, generally only tailpipe emissions are measurable. If you are missing your catalytic convertor and can still pass smog, then fine
/html/mgs/1998-07/msg00725.html (8,960 bytes)

3. Re: Disregard for Pollution Control Standards (score: 1)
Author: Patrick Bailey <pbailey@qnet.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 08:49:38 -0700
You are correct Bill The brain dead beaurocrats won't listen You could take a car in for testing and it would pass EXCEPT for the visual so it will fail.Isn't this stupid!Why not have them sniff the
/html/mgs/1998-07/msg00751.html (9,313 bytes)

4. Re: Disregard for Pollution Control Standards (score: 1)
Author: William Elliott <William.Elliott@mail.mei.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 11:11:07 -0500
It's only going to get worse. Did you see the VP on TV recently? Used stats showing the past decade is the warmest on record. Then said that confirmed "global warming" and the need for even tighter r
/html/mgs/1998-07/msg00755.html (9,074 bytes)

5. Re: Disregard for Pollution Control Standards (score: 1)
Author: Blake Wylie <bwylie@HiWAAY.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 11:54:46 -0500 (CDT)
It's all politics...he's scaring everyone to vote for him because he "cares." You're exactly on the mark with your comments though. :P (not to start a debate with our Democrat friends)... :P heheh Bl
/html/mgs/1998-07/msg00756.html (9,820 bytes)

6. Re: Disregard for Pollution Control Standards (score: 1)
Author: "Dan Ray" <danray@bluegrass.net>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 13:30:05 -0500
One thing we CAN do is make sure our VP doesn't get somewhere where he can do some REAL damage -- like in the Oval Office! :) Dan (menace to society) 73 B 96 SUV the for
/html/mgs/1998-07/msg00758.html (8,789 bytes)

7. Re: Disregard for Pollution Control Standards (score: 1)
Author: john peloquin <peloquin@galaxy.ucr.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 12:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
We pretty much know for a fact that global temperatures were higher in the Carboniferous period than they are today- AND may have been warmer 1000 years ago. So this "warmest decade on record" looks
/html/mgs/1998-07/msg00761.html (9,390 bytes)

8. Re: Disregard for Pollution Control Standards (score: 1)
Author: john peloquin <peloquin@galaxy.ucr.edu>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 12:00:59 -0700 (PDT)
Hear Hear, Bill, You've hit the nail on the head. No matter who is correct with regards to the "global warming" controversy, proper analysis is essential to "do the right thing". When I was a kid- no
/html/mgs/1998-07/msg00762.html (9,237 bytes)

9. Re: Disregard for Pollution Control Standards (score: 1)
Author: "Andrew B. Lundgren" <lundgren@iname.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 17:47:18 -0600
The pres. said that he that he had stats back to the 1400s shwing the hotest years had all been in the '90s. I'd like to see his Incan/Mayan Aborigine etc. tempature records to prove it. Seems to me
/html/mgs/1998-07/msg00778.html (8,893 bytes)

10. Re: Disregard for Pollution Control Standards (score: 1)
Author: gofastmg@juno.com (Rick Morrison)
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 1998 23:03:05 EDT
Bill Clinton lying? Come now, you know that would never happen Rick Morrison 72 MGBGT 74 Midget
/html/mgs/1998-07/msg00788.html (8,667 bytes)

11. Re: Disregard for Pollution Control Standards (score: 1)
Author: "Andrew B. Lundgren" <lundgren@iname.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 08:23:17 -0600
What really bothers me is there are MANY people in the US who do not have to conform to the standards. All of the rural areas (that I am aware of) are uncontrolled. But since I live it a big city, wh
/html/mgs/1998-07/msg00811.html (9,220 bytes)

12. Re: Disregard for Pollution Control Standards (score: 1)
Author: "Ray e. Huff" <mgbrh@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 07:39:51 -0700
/html/mgs/1998-07/msg00812.html (10,498 bytes)

13. Re: Disregard for Pollution Control Standards (score: 1)
Author: john peloquin <peloquin@galaxy.ucr.edu>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 07:49:49 -0700 (PDT)
I suspect he is relying on European statistics, rather than North American. Given that the point was GLOBAL temperatures, this could be considered acceptable. However, I am sceptical that any warming
/html/mgs/1998-07/msg00814.html (9,331 bytes)

14. Re: Disregard for Pollution Control Standards (score: 1)
Author: William Elliott <William.Elliott@mail.mei.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 10:08:44 -0500
Let me offer an alternative view. People in parts of the country where emissions are not stringently tested still are forced into compliance by having to purchase new vehicles which meet standards. I
/html/mgs/1998-07/msg00815.html (9,122 bytes)

15. Re: Disregard for Pollution Control Standards (score: 1)
Author: "Scott McKorkle" <bmc@aa.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 08:54:40 -0700
Not to defend the VP, but I believe the records he cites come from evaluation of core samples and other archaeological data. I think many of the core samples come from the Antarctic and other ice pac
/html/mgs/1998-07/msg00820.html (8,763 bytes)

16. Re: Disregard for Pollution Control Standards (score: 1)
Author: William Elliott <William.Elliott@mail.mei.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 1998 10:53:10 -0500
Hey, let's not let the FACTS get in the way of a good program! Remember, it's the _intention_ that's important. Bill Elliott Lake Mills, WI will be wishing for a little "Global Warming" come January!
/html/mgs/1998-07/msg00822.html (8,081 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu