Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Drivetrain\s+losses\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Drivetrain\s+losses\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Drivetrain losses (score: 1): Author: Skip Higginbotham <saltrat@pro-blend.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 17:49:11 -0800; Hi Team, Over the past few weeks the subject of "how much HP" to go "how fast" has received much attention and Mayf's chart report is an excellent vehicle to get to the required horsepower....at the; /html/land-speed/2000-01/msg00262.html (8,280 bytes)
2. Re: Drivetrain losses (score: 1): Author: tschoen <j82244@fuse.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 19:09:56 -0500; This may not help much since I'm running a FWD Honda and most folks are RWD but I figure about a 10% drivetrain loss on the dyno (rubber on steel) and maybe 15% on the Maxton concrete. This lines up; /html/land-speed/2000-01/msg00265.html (8,616 bytes)
3. Re: Drivetrain losses (score: 1): Author: Ronald_B_Anderson@notes.seagate.com; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 17:30:08 -0700; Roughly, on asphalt, from flywheel HP, 15% loss manual transmission, 20% loss automatic transmission, add another 10% to either for salt. -- Ron USFRA This may not help much since I'm running a FWD; /html/land-speed/2000-01/msg00266.html (8,945 bytes)
4. Re: Drivetrain losses (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 19:53:42 -0500; The NASCAR guys tell me the loss for them is 15%.; /html/land-speed/2000-01/msg00268.html (8,816 bytes)
5. Re: Drivetrain losses (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 20:04:13 -0500; Giving some thought to the drive train losses for "salt"...which I haven't thought about before...because doing standard, math, speed calculations, and using my time slips as a comparison, I don't se; /html/land-speed/2000-01/msg00269.html (10,220 bytes)
6. Re: Drivetrain losses (score: 1): Author: "David Haller" <dhaller@techline.com>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 21:37:55 -0800; You cut me to the quick, it's 34 and snowing, my feet are cold and I can only dream of warmer and dryer places, Enjoy, Dave Haller #93 -- Original Message -- From: Skip Higginbotham <saltrat@pro-ble; /html/land-speed/2000-01/msg00283.html (9,007 bytes)
7. Re: Drivetrain losses (score: 1): Author: Skip Higginbotham <saltrat@pro-blend.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 08:42:58 -0800; We have an extra room! Rent's pretty good.; /html/land-speed/2000-01/msg00290.html (9,271 bytes)
8. Re: Drivetrain losses (score: 1): Author: "Lawrence E. & Cathy R. Mayfield" <lemay@hiwaay.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2000 22:52:29; ** * The following is one man's opinion. It is not gosphel, nor is it * * to be taken as law. If you disagree, then so be it. If there are * * other factors involved or experience with real hard data; /html/land-speed/2000-01/msg00298.html (14,430 bytes)
9. Re: Drivetrain losses (score: 1): Author: dferguso@ebmail.gdeb.com; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 13:01:19 -0500; hey mayf - im NOT going to throw my dog in, just curious 1. whats does the inertia values of the gears have to do with steady state hp loss ?- how bout the inertia of the driveshaft, axles, tranny ma; /html/land-speed/2000-01/msg00302.html (8,635 bytes)
10. Re: Drivetrain losses (score: 1): Author: Glen Barrett <speedtimer@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 17:22:55 -0800; I sure love the beachs in California, only wore a coat about three time since; /html/land-speed/2000-01/msg00314.html (9,482 bytes)
11. Re: Drivetrain losses (score: 1): Author: "David Haller" <dhaller@techline.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2000 17:56:36 -0800; Now your getting cruel, it's 38 out here and raining. Miss that warm weather big time, Dave H. #93 -- Original Message -- From: Glen Barrett <speedtimer@earthlink.net> To: Skip Higginbotham <saltrat@; /html/land-speed/2000-01/msg00315.html (10,152 bytes)
12. Re: Drivetrain losses (score: 1): Author: SaltyCuda@aol.com; Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2000 01:59:17 EST; I read in a catalog, I believe it was Somer's Bros., that the mopar 8 3/4" rear end was more efficient than a Ford 9". Something about the geometric relationship between the pinion gear and the ring; /html/land-speed/2000-01/msg00355.html (7,606 bytes)
13. Re: Drivetrain losses (score: 1): Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 14:47:18 -0800 (PST); I been a Mopar Man since hemis were invented. The 8 3/4 mopar rear is better - but you can get more ratios for the Ford. == Dick J in east Texas ECTA #72 FX/GMR Do You Yahoo!?; /html/land-speed/2000-01/msg00443.html (7,919 bytes)
14. Re: Drivetrain losses (score: 1): Author: "John Beckett" <landspeedracer@email.msn.com>; Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 08:42:06 -0500; Almost every other rear is more efficient than the Ford 9", but not necessarily stronger. John Beckett, LSR #79; /html/land-speed/2000-01/msg00462.html (8,442 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]