Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Driving\s+philosophies\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Driving philosophies (score: 1)
Author: "Maynard Hirsch" <mghirsch@netzero.net>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2002 08:03:48 -0500
Rick you're wrong about one thing. If you enter an intersection when the light is yellow, you have not committed a violation even if the light turns red when you are in the intersection. Maynard ///
/html/mgs/2002-08/msg00991.html (7,387 bytes)

2. Re: Driving philosophies (score: 1)
Author: Charles & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 06:29:02 -0500
I don't know where you live, but in Texas, if you don't clear the intersection by the time the light turns red, you ran the light. Cheers, /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archive
/html/mgs/2002-08/msg01042.html (7,653 bytes)

3. Re: Driving philosophies (score: 1)
Author: "Harold Pulcher" <pulcher@killercomputing.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 09:02:10 -0500
You would be mistaken. If you have ever received a ticket for that offense you were taken. According to the officer conducting one(:)) of my Defensive driving classes: In Texas, as long as you break
/html/mgs/2002-08/msg01047.html (8,402 bytes)

4. Re: Driving philosophies (score: 1)
Author: Eric <eric@erickson.on.net>
Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 00:16:17 +0930
Hence the people who put the foot down if they see the light turn amber, so they can get into the intersection before it turns red. -- Eric '68MGB MkII Adelaide, South Australia "Nothing overshadows
/html/mgs/2002-08/msg01049.html (7,524 bytes)

5. Re: Driving philosophies (score: 1)
Author: Tab Julius <tab@penworks.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 11:08:52 -0400
In Boston they ignore the lights altogether (the lights are merely However, for a real experience, try a developing country. I had the most interesting driving (rather, passenger) experience riding i
/html/mgs/2002-08/msg01051.html (8,138 bytes)

6. RE: Driving philosophies (score: 1)
Author: Chuck Renner <crenner@dynalivery.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 12:59:39 -0500
And one of the problems with red light cameras when they don't make the money they hope for is to arbitrarily change what the camera determines to be a violation. And in the case of Mesa, Arizona, y
/html/mgs/2002-08/msg01066.html (8,003 bytes)

7. Re: Driving philosophies (score: 1)
Author: WSpohn4@aol.com
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:19:22 EDT
In BC, when you see a yellow light, you are to stop "unless the stop can not be made in safety". In other words, if you'd end up stopped in the middle of the intersection, you don't do that, you cont
/html/mgs/2002-08/msg01069.html (7,712 bytes)

8. Re: Driving Philosophies (score: 1)
Author: WSpohn4@aol.com
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 14:21:43 EDT
Not everywhere. Our statute defines it as 'yellow'. I guess you can call it whatever you like, although why something the colour of ossified tree pitch should be more appropriate escapes me just now.
/html/mgs/2002-08/msg01071.html (7,711 bytes)

9. RE: Driving philosophies (score: 1)
Author: "Maynard Hirsch" <mghirsch@netzero.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2002 21:57:07 -0500
I live in Illinois. The law here states that the light has to be red when entering an intersection for there to be a violation. Maynard /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives a
/html/mgs/2002-08/msg01083.html (7,350 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu