Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Dyno\s+junk\s*$/: 15 ]

Total 15 documents matching your query.

1. Dyno junk (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:13:47 -0500
Well Dave just finished the pulls..... they worked on a bunch of things trying to get more power on the motor but the intake seems to have an issue...and the headers are a bit large.... but it seems
/html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00211.html (7,791 bytes)

2. Re: Dyno junk (score: 1)
Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 13:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
Keith Turk <kturk@ala.net> wrote: Life is GOOD... Like Al on "Happy Days" said: "Eeeyah, eeyah. eyah." Just the fact that we get to do this for fun proves that life is, indeed, good! It's sure a lot
/html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00212.html (8,222 bytes)

3. Re: Dyno junk (score: 1)
Author: LGMCAFEE@aol.com
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 16:34:38 EDT
<< Well Dave just finished the pulls..... they worked on a bunch of things trying to get more power on the motor but the intake seems to have an issue...and the headers are a bit large.... but it see
/html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00213.html (7,662 bytes)

4. Re: Dyno junk (score: 1)
Author: Joe Timney <joetimney@dol.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 20:58:30 -0400
I spent the day with my crew, Tommy Torch, Sammy Sawsall and Paully Plasma-Cutter, working away in the shop. I now have a Girly Camaro with a very cleaned out interior and the rear end is missing! Oh
/html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00217.html (8,326 bytes)

5. Re: Dyno junk (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Apr 2002 23:34:55 -0500
Mayf.... we're both in basic agreement with you.... 540hp was way down from what we expected.... BUT the one thing we know is that this motor is doing this at a much lower RPM and it should do it rel
/html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00224.html (10,187 bytes)

6. Re: Dyno Junk (score: 1)
Author: "landspeedracer" <landspeedracer@msn.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Apr 2002 08:56:03 -0400
Finally the Girly Camaro gets a proper suspension and rear. Now along with his new dependable engine maybe Keith can go fast this year. JB very lot of /// unsubscribe/change address requests to major
/html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00231.html (8,218 bytes)

7. Re: Dyno junk (score: 1)
Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 06:49:19 -0400
Well here is the deal on KT's 298... Some good news some bad. Good news is that it seems to run fine with a couple of exceptions. Intake manifold is not much more than a door stop and the heads while
/html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00245.html (13,988 bytes)

8. Re: Dyno junk (score: 1)
Author: "SMITH KENTON E" <ksmith6@mindspring.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 14:40:08 -0600
What are the specs on the heads you are using? We're spec'ing heads for a 255ci SBC and I'm curious what you found was too big. Thanks, Ken maybe to /// unsubscribe/change address requests to majord
/html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00247.html (7,925 bytes)

9. Re: Dyno junk (score: 1)
Author: "Bryan A. Savage Jr" <basavage@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 15:31:52 -0700
Dave & Keith, Thanks for the valuable information. Another nugget for the archive! Bryan (I've paid for a magazine just for this kind of information and unlike Dave, I know that magazine data can't a
/html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00248.html (7,635 bytes)

10. Re: Dyno junk (score: 1)
Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rap.midco.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 17:54:05 -0600
Thats right Brian, I know a fella who had a long write up on his bike in one of the mainstream mags, they quoted 101 hp on the dyno at the rear wheel, well he was there when they ran it and it made 8
/html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00249.html (7,922 bytes)

11. Re: Dyno junk (score: 1)
Author: Joe Amo <jkamo@rap.midco.net>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 14:28:16 -0600
Dave thanks for the insight!! Do I understand correctly that you were at about 26 degrees timing advance while injecting nitrous thanks again, its not everyday that someone shares VALUABLE dyno time
/html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00251.html (7,628 bytes)

12. Re: Dyno junk (score: 1)
Author: Ed Van Scoy <ed@vetteracing.com>
Date: Sat, 13 Apr 2002 16:07:59 -0700
Great report Dave, & great info. The numbers seem pretty good to me, I think you have a package that will get the job done. One thing I have learned over the years is high HP #'s are great, but if it
/html/land-speed/2002-04/msg00252.html (7,677 bytes)

13. Dyno junk (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 21:12:11 -0500
600.6 hp and 393.4 lb's of torque.... that was the number.... No cam changes..... three carb changes..... 2 jet changes...3 timing changes.... those are the Gas Numbers..... it's good enough or it's
/html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00693.html (6,769 bytes)

14. Re: Dyno junk (score: 1)
Author: Dick J <lsr_man@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 06:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
.... I think The "REAL" dyno - - - the only one that counts! Dick J Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ /// /// land-speed@autox.team.net mailing list //
/html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00696.html (6,823 bytes)

15. Re: Dyno junk (score: 1)
Author: William T Smith <WmTSmith@landracing.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 22:46:51 -0600 (MDT)
What rpm? 1. peak torque 2. hp 3. 8 and 10 percent drop from peak.?wmts Quoting Keith Turk <kturk@ala.net>: number.... No cam changes...3 timing changes.... it's not.... I think going to tell the wor
/html/land-speed/2001-06/msg00715.html (7,354 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu