- 1. E- --EVOLUTION (score: 1)
- Author: Sparky <wmtsmith@landracing.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 10:15:28 -0500
- IF you want a Chevy--look at the new I-6 inline in the mid size SUV--454 stroke, DOHC, 4 valves per cyl and you and run it efi or otherwise--the parts are now available "Sparky" Lakester 2211
- /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00011.html (7,398 bytes)
- 2. RE: E- --EVOLUTION (score: 1)
- Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 12:24:38 -0500
- An in-line cylinder arrangement like that one or the Ecotec should be advantageous in a streamliner-- it offers a lower frontal area than a V. Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ IF you want a Chevy--look at th
- /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00021.html (7,952 bytes)
- 3. Re: E- --EVOLUTION (score: 1)
- Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 16:52:02 -0400
- Still gotta get your shoulders in there.
- /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00028.html (7,869 bytes)
- 4. Re: E- --EVOLUTION (score: 1)
- Author: Flowbench@aol.com
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 17:52:31 EDT
- Yep, minimum width ID about 22" average. Mike
- /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00031.html (7,572 bytes)
- 5. RE: E- --EVOLUTION (score: 1)
- Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 17:58:08 -0500
- Use a shoehorn. :) Regards, Neil Tucson, AZ Still gotta get your shoulders in there. V.
- /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00032.html (8,132 bytes)
- 6. Re: E- --EVOLUTION (score: 1)
- Author: Bryan Savage <b.a.savage@earthlink.net>
- Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 19:45:03 -0700
- Maybe not -- just have Jack design a streamliner where the driver lies on their side
- /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00035.html (8,093 bytes)
- 7. Re: E- --EVOLUTION (score: 1)
- Author: "J I Waldron" <jwaldron47@earthlink.net>
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 10:29:09 -0400
- How much additional should one allow for a fire suit? 1 inch? 1 inch each side? More? Less? Thanks, Jim.
- /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00041.html (7,901 bytes)
- 8. Re: E- --EVOLUTION (score: 1)
- Author: "Thomas E. Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>
- Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 08:17:39 -0700
- In Biblical times it was customary for people to recline at the table. They ate lying on their side. I assume the Romans did the same. A few of many quotes from the bible signifying the above. Luke
- /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00044.html (8,313 bytes)
- 9. Re: E- --EVOLUTION (score: 1)
- Author: "John Beckett" <saltracer@servusa.com>
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 11:50:59 -0400
- Wow, didn't think of it that way, always thought it meant to lay back. Must have taken a lot of room around the table to fit every body, but maybe they didn't use a table. We ate on the floor when I
- /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00045.html (9,192 bytes)
- 10. Re: E- --EVOLUTION (score: 1)
- Author: Nt788@aol.com
- Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 12:20:37 EDT
- I'm still biblical, I only eat grapes on my side like the Romans at this time. Jack
- /html/land-speed/2004-09/msg00047.html (7,482 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu