Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*E\-Mail\s+me\s+off\s+the\s+list\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*E\-Mail\s+me\s+off\s+the\s+list\s*$/: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

1. E-Mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: "David & Aleah" <etfreak@onemain.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 20:53:59 -0800; It appears that you have to be part of some sort of "clic" to have your experience count for anything on this mailer. I guess I'll take my 20+ years of wrenching and my 12 second Tiger and go home. P; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00109.html (7,543 bytes)
2. Re: E-Mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: Mr&Mrs Margi&Norm <rootes1@best.com>; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 22:31:20 -0800; Me too. ncm; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00110.html (7,738 bytes)
3. Re: E-Mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: cvaught@hawaii.rr.com; Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2001 20:45:25 -1000; did i miss something here? what is the problem? maybee i missed a thread or something. chris 66 Sunbeam Tiger, 289, Performer RPM intake & cam, Holley 600 DP, Mallory ignition, aluminum radiator, 4; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00111.html (8,577 bytes)
4. RE: E-Mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: "Smit, Theo" <theo.smit@intel.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 08:02:23 -0800; Huh? The only clique you have to be part of is the one that shares the knowledge that you have. There will always be those with a different opinion and you may get the occasional "you're wrong and I; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00114.html (8,937 bytes)
5. RE: E-Mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: Sencindiver Jim D NSSC <SencindiverJD@NAVSEA.NAVY.MIL>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:03:34 -0500; I agree with Theo. I have less than one year experience with a Tiger, and definitely will listen to someone that has 20+ years experience. (especially if they have a Tiger that runs in the 12's!) Kee; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00115.html (9,622 bytes)
6. RE: E-Mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: rhoefle@ctlinc.com; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 11:40:22 -0500; Theo has it right, this is a free-sharing forum. What I don't understand is what led up to Dave's aggravation. I am something of a packrat and have kept this list's emails all the way back to Sept. 1; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00116.html (8,291 bytes)
7. Re: E-Mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: Mark Fridenstine <laceyf@crosslink.net>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 16:17:03 -0800; Can somebody show or tell me how to run in the 12's. I'd like to know. But maybe they tried to send to the list and was unsucessful and he thought nobody would answerd him. I don't know the real reas; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00118.html (9,092 bytes)
8. Re: E-Mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: cvaught@hawaii.rr.com; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 12:47:55 -1000; simple in a tiger. posi unit in the rear with 3.55. gears, wide ratio in the tranny, and a some NOS if your engine is stock and some drag radials to aid in traction. now i thought this list was full; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00119.html (10,004 bytes)
9. Re: E-Mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <larry.p@erols.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 18:39:36 -0500; Dave, ditto what Theo said, and I also missed the comments that set you off. Anyone running 12's is doing something right, as that is fast. Larry; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00120.html (9,793 bytes)
10. E-mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: "David & Aleah" <etfreak@onemain.com>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 21:05:49 -0800; Thank you all for your concern. I have to say some of your replies were both heart felt and others were just plain funny. The one that cracked me up the most was "Cris in Mississippi" he wrote "let; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00126.html (12,151 bytes)
11. Re: E-mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: cvaught@hawaii.rr.com; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 19:37:48 -1000; well i did contact the guy about hard top because i have one that i do not used taking up space. i also was the first one to tell james barret that his valves were to tight. he did not mention me in; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00127.html (9,752 bytes)
12. RE: E-Mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 22:06:37 -0800; Assuming you fix the problem that's killing your engine over 5,000 rpm, let's look at the best recipe for quick quarter mile times. Let's say your motor, after it's fixed, gets a maximum of 350 HP @; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00128.html (11,176 bytes)
13. Re: E-Mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <larry.p@erols.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:58:00 -0500; Bob, interesting point on the shift points. I understand having the revs in the sweet spot, but how did the 80% come about. If I have the stock motor and cam from the 90 5.0L, and its max hp is at 52; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00130.html (12,155 bytes)
14. RE: E-Mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 07:04:56 -0800; The 80% value comes from the ratios in the transmission and is really different for each shift, and depending on what transmission/gears you have. I have an article that covers this on the TigersUni; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00131.html (11,006 bytes)
15. RE: E-Mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 07:20:42 -0800; Just to be clear about the 80%, that's just my personal "comfort level", that also allows for some margin of error, which is bound to happen, even with a rev limiter. But it's more the concept I'm t; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00132.html (9,252 bytes)
16. RE: E-Mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: "Fraser, Ron" <Ron.Fraser@usa.xerox.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:17:52 -0500; I'm not sure about the 80% part but I did see an explanation about shift points. You need to look at your engine's Torque Curve and you need to know what the RPM change is for each of your transmiss; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00133.html (9,382 bytes)
17. RE: E-Mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 08:43:20 -0800; It's interesting that this kind of mis-information is so pervasive. The torque curve is definitely not what you want to use to pick the shift points, although there seems to be a fair number of peop; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00134.html (10,138 bytes)
18. RE: E-Mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: "Chris Thompson" <cthompson@rrinc.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 11:50:35 -0500; I've read so many arguments about when to shift. Interestingly, in the Skip Barber Racing book "Going Faster", the only mention on getting to speed is to shift at the redline. This is stated in, like; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00135.html (11,280 bytes)
19. RE: E-Mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 09:22:49 -0800; I guess we just have to hope the engine builder, or whoever sets the redline, knows what he's doing. ;-) I think where the rabbit gets lost is between the engine and the rear wheels. It is certainly; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00137.html (9,143 bytes)
20. RE: E-Mail me off the list (score: 1): Author: "Koss, Christopher (GEAE)" <christopher.koss@ae.ge.com>; Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:37:44 -0500; Torque gets you going....horsepower makes you go faster !!!!!!!!!!!!!; /html/tigers/2001-02/msg00140.html (9,852 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]