Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*E\-Types\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*E\-Types\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: E-Types (score: 1): Author: mit-eddie!cbmvax.commodore.com!augi@EDDIE.MIT.EDU (Joe Augenbraun); Date: Mon, 2 Apr 90 10:27:40 EDT; The 1968 has the same cooling system as most 1967's (dual fans on the radiator). That's what makes the 1967 marginally more desirable than other 4.2 SI's. I don't remember on the brakes. I think all; /html/british-cars/1990-04/msg00014.html (7,521 bytes)
2. E-Types (score: 1): Author: "S.W. Cox CMP Staff" <mit-eddie!sys.uea.ac.uk!swc@EDDIE.MIT.EDU>; Date: Fri, 30 Mar 90 09:40:24 BST; I thought that the series 1 and a half was the most desireable of all - with the same body of a series 1 (rear lights above bumper, covered headlamps etc.) and the 4.2 engine of the series 2? Please; /html/british-cars/1990-03/msg00357.html (6,977 bytes)
3. Re: E-Types (score: 1): Author: mit-eddie!harvard!beaver.cs.washington.edu!microsoft!timke@EDDIE.MIT.EDU; Date: Fri Mar 30 10:49:08 1990; well, desirability is somewhat a matter of opinion and somewhat a matter of market definition. the 1.5 has some advantages and some drawbacks: great looks of series 1, except for those cool headligh; /html/british-cars/1990-03/msg00371.html (8,802 bytes)
4. Re: E-Types (score: 1): Author: mit-eddie!cbmvax.commodore.com!augi@EDDIE.MIT.EDU (Joe Augenbraun); Date: Fri, 30 Mar 90 11:28:16 EDT; No, you're thinking of later SI cars. Around '64 or so the 4.2 engine became optional (3.8 was the only engine available before then). It is an option that virtually every car has. Simultaneously th; /html/british-cars/1990-03/msg00372.html (8,551 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]