Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*EP\s+GT6\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*EP\s+GT6\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. EP GT6 (score: 1): Author: bob bownes <rbownes@neworks.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 10:35:58 -0500; Well I just hauled the 'parts' GT into the garage this weekend. Really looks like a parts car. Kristen will be happy. I mean, it would only take two floors, four quarter panels, a rear valence, and p; /html/fot/1999-01/msg00193.html (7,247 bytes)
2. Re: EP GT6 (score: 1): Author: Bob Lang <LANG@ISIS.MIT.EDU>; Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 10:56:15 -0500 (EST); Sounds like one of my projects! Oooh. I forget the older reference, but I know that in A Prepared, GT6's can run larger "choke tubes" than TR6's - 30 mm (or was it 33mm??) vs. 28 mm for the 2.5l. The; /html/fot/1999-01/msg00194.html (8,350 bytes)
3. Re: EP GT6 (score: 1): Author: Mark J Bradakis <mjb@cs.utah.edu>; Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 11:07:53 -0700 (MST); Yes, I've been keeping an eye on the GT6 rules myself. One thing I did notice is that apparently it is not legal to modify the bonnet to clear carbs, so using three DCOEs would require using the step; /html/fot/1999-01/msg00195.html (7,007 bytes)
4. Re: EP GT6 (score: 1): Author: cak@dimebank.com (Chris Kantarjiev); Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 10:24:02 -0800; No, I think that (if rules allow, I no longer remember) the right approach on an EP GT6 is to move the engine back. This solves some weight distribution issues as well as bonnet clearance, and allows; /html/fot/1999-01/msg00196.html (6,985 bytes)
5. Re: EP GT6 (score: 1): Author: Mark J Bradakis <mjb@cs.utah.edu>; Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 11:44:49 -0700 (MST); Well, there's a bit more time to think about my GT6 plans. I still have work to do on Killer for the season opener in, what, maybe a month and a half, and get the yellow Midget driveable, and finish; /html/fot/1999-01/msg00197.html (7,090 bytes)
6. Re: EP GT6 (score: 1): Author: bob bownes <rbownes@neworks.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:16:26 -0500; You are correct. You can move the engine down & back. iii; /html/fot/1999-01/msg00198.html (7,155 bytes)
7. RE: EP GT6 (score: 1): Author: "Barr, Scott" <sbarr@mccarty-law.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 14:17:49 -0600; Hmmmm.... now if you can move it DOWN and back, that makes it a lot less complicated doesn't it. Or does it not go down far enough for the valve cover to avoid the scuttle? Scott; /html/fot/1999-01/msg00199.html (7,713 bytes)
8. RE: EP GT6 (score: 1): Author: bob bownes <rbownes@neworks.net>; Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 15:24:51 -0500; Doesn't got *THAT* far down. And you have to 'modify' the scuttle with a hammer a bit to really get any benefit out of it. iii; /html/fot/1999-01/msg00200.html (7,124 bytes)
9. RE: EP GT6 (score: 1): Author: "Barr, Scott" <sbarr@mccarty-law.com>; Date: Tue, 26 Jan 1999 14:22:39 -0600; Hell, I've got a hammer ...; /html/fot/1999-01/msg00201.html (7,542 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]