Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ESP\s+vs\.\s+FSP\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ESP\s+vs\.\s+FSP\?\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. ESP vs. FSP? (score: 1): Author: "Reptile Racing" <reptile_racing@hotmail.com>; Date: Sat, 27 Nov 1999 22:18:56 MST; I'm confused about the new FSP category for 2000. Is ESP staying the same in 2000 or are the cars that are currently competing in ESP moving to FSP next year? TIA, Cecil Walker '98 SVT Cobra Was FS; /html/autox/1999-11/msg01126.html (6,610 bytes)
2. Re: ESP vs. FSP? (score: 1): Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>; Date: Sat, 27 Nov 1999 22:32:58 -0700; The latest Fastrack clarified that the ESP guys all asked to stay within that letter designation, so the reshuffled cars all go to FSP instead. ESP stays "as was". Scott Meyers 240 SX Looking for new; /html/autox/1999-11/msg01127.html (6,655 bytes)
3. Re: ESP vs. FSP? (score: 1): Author: Jeff Cashmore <cashmo@execpc.com>; Date: Sun, 28 Nov 1999 12:10:44 -0600; "The latest Fastrack clarified that the ESP guys all asked to stay within that letter designation" There was a similar debate going on awhile back on the wheel to wheel list regarding road racing cla; /html/autox/1999-11/msg01130.html (7,439 bytes)
4. Re: ESP vs. FSP? (score: 1): Author: "Rocky Entriken" <rocky@tri.net>; Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1999 02:10:46 -0600; Since you asked... Your statement of what happened to A-D Production is accurate at a very simplistic level, which for this purpose serves us just fine. GT1-4 were invented in 1980 and GT5 came in in; /html/autox/1999-11/msg01144.html (10,663 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]