Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Ebayers\s+watching\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Ebayers\s+watching\.\.\.\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. Ebayers watching... (score: 1): Author: Carlo Bernardino <crbernardino@mac.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 09:55:50 -0400; All you ebay watchers - Ken Miles Tiger is listing again - bids up to 40,000 but still not at reserve... On another front there is a Tiger being listed (listing #4574089120). it was initially listed; /html/tigers/2005-09/msg00139.html (7,539 bytes)
2. RE: Ebayers watching... (score: 1): Author: "Theo Smit" <theo.smit@dynastream.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 08:05:52 -0600; Nice Raydot on the right turn signal... Other than that, it's pretty obvious that the guy listing it on eBay doesn't know much about Tiger production history, and the way he's presenting it, it's not; /html/tigers/2005-09/msg00140.html (7,594 bytes)
3. Re: Ebayers watching... (score: 1): Author: Stephen Waybright <gswaybright@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 08:45:08 -0700 (PDT); The VIN# as well as the round corner doors clearly show it's not a MkII. The seller either knows little/nothing about Tigers or is intentionally misleading prospective buyers. The $15k starting bid s; /html/tigers/2005-09/msg00141.html (8,142 bytes)
4. Re: Ebayers watching... (score: 1): Author: MWood24020@aol.com; Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 12:33:51 EDT; Just a question: Has there EVER been a Tiger which came up on ebay about which there wasn't concerns expressed on this list? ;-) Mike Wood; /html/tigers/2005-09/msg00142.html (7,306 bytes)
5. Re: Ebayers watching... (score: 1): Author: CoolVT@aol.com; Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 13:13:25 EDT; Yes, very recently....the Myles Prototype. Oops, there were concerns with the reserve price;-) Mark; /html/tigers/2005-09/msg00143.html (7,245 bytes)
6. Re: Ebayers watching... (score: 1): Author: Stephen Waybright <gswaybright@yahoo.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 10:15:55 -0700 (PDT); It just occured to me that they may have originally listed it as a Mk IV being confused with the similar vintage Alpines. Of course you then have to wonder why someone with so little knowledge of Tig; /html/tigers/2005-09/msg00144.html (7,999 bytes)
7. Re: Ebayers watching... (score: 1): Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@socal.rr.com>; Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 14:02:16 -0700; Yes. Currently the Ken Miles prototype is listed. The one, and only Harrington Tiger was listed, and there have been other cars that appear to be original Tigers. If there were a "hot market" for vi; /html/tigers/2005-09/msg00146.html (8,863 bytes)
8. Re: Ebayers watching... (score: 1): Author: "Will Seay" <wseay@ntelos.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:45:36 -0400; /html/tigers/2005-09/msg00151.html (7,524 bytes)
9. Re: Ebayers watching... (score: 1): Author: "Philip \"Commodore Blues\" Hulse" <phulse@gte.net>; Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2005 19:31:47 -0700; My Alpine was never questioned and it is a converted Tiger. You can tell because it does not have the original rivets. Oh, and it just took 3rd Place in the PDX ABFM in the Tiger category. No fooling; /html/tigers/2005-09/msg00154.html (7,682 bytes)
10. Re: Ebayers watching... (score: 1): Author: Drmoonstone@aol.com; Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 17:15:57 EDT; Listed as a 1966 MKI Moonstone; /html/tigers/2005-09/msg00167.html (7,173 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]