Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Edelbrock\:\s+Carter\)carb\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Edelbrock\:\s+Carter\)carb\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. RE: Edelbrock: Carter)carb (score: 1): Author: "Jim Stuart" <jimbb88@erols.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2001 22:11:00 -0400; That is the inherent ability of the Carter/Edelbrock design that makes it superior to the Holley for normal people. The Holley may eventually outperform the C/E carbs, but only with many modificatio; /html/mgb-v8/2001-08/msg00032.html (8,692 bytes)
2. Re: Edelbrock: Carter)carb (score: 1): Author: "bown" <bown@concentric.net>; Date: Wed, 15 Aug 2001 01:17:17 -0600; I mostly agree with what Jim Stuart has said. I think that the Carter/Edelbrock/Weber 4-barrel is a superior street and mild performance carb. However for all out power a finely tuned Holley is bette; /html/mgb-v8/2001-08/msg00033.html (10,422 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]