Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Elec\s+Fans\s+vs\s+Efficiency\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Elec\s+Fans\s+vs\s+Efficiency\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Elec Fans vs Efficiency (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 29 Mar 1998 17:16:13 EST; Fellow Listers: I have been following the thread re electric vs directly driven fans on our beloved Triumphs. Someone made the observation that electric fans must be more efficient as all new cars us; /html/triumphs/1998-03/msg02509.html (7,145 bytes)
2. Re: Elec Fans vs Efficiency (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Sun, 29 Mar 1998 17:30:20 -0800; There's one difference between the older examples you cite (I think it was the Simca which had all the sheetmetal for ducting--I worked on one about twenty years ago, and it was a nightmare getting i; /html/triumphs/1998-03/msg02520.html (8,254 bytes)
3. Re: Elec Fans vs Efficiency (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 21:24:27 -0600; Efficiency has a lot to do with new cars having electric fans. Crank driven fans (whether they are direct mounted or with a viscous clutch) require a lot of energy to turn at speed when you're trave; /html/triumphs/1998-03/msg02647.html (7,603 bytes)
4. Re: Elec Fans vs Efficiency (score: 1): Author: Unknown; Date: Mon, 30 Mar 1998 22:24:27 -0500; Another reason for the widespread use of electric fans is emissions. Manufacturers have found that running engines at much hotter temperatures helps in the reduction of them darned ozone depleters. I; /html/triumphs/1998-03/msg02650.html (8,674 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]