Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Electrolytic\s+cleaning\s+of\s+metal\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Electrolytic\s+cleaning\s+of\s+metal\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Electrolytic cleaning of metal (score: 1): Author: "Wiedemeyer" <boxweed@thebest.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 11:46:32 -0400; I finally figured out how to attach these directions for electrolysis of rusty parts. By the way, please note that the iron bar attaches to the (+) side of the charger, and the rusty part attaches t; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01209.html (15,602 bytes)
2. Re: Electrolytic cleaning of metal (score: 1): Author: Valentine <valntine@ptd.net>; Date: Sun, 17 Oct 1999 22:37:37 -0400; The neg. wire ALWAYS goes to the part being cleaned!! If you reverse the polarity the part will be disolved! I know several people who have accomplished "part disolution" by conecting the pos. to th; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01257.html (8,072 bytes)
3. Re: Electrolytic cleaning of metal (score: 1): Author: Lancer7676@aol.com; Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 06:27:24 EDT; One area of difference I saw between the post that Keven sent and the treatise on electrolytic rust removal in this link: <A HREF="http://members.xoom.com/nlindsey/restoration/Restoration.htm">Rusty; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01263.html (8,172 bytes)
4. Re: Electrolytic cleaning of metal (score: 1): Author: Frank Clarici <spritenut@Exit109.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 08:53:45 -0400; Kevin is absolutly right. He made me write this on the blackboard 100 times. Negative to part...negative to part... -- Frank Drive it or give it to somebody that will http://www.exit109.com/~spritenu; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01266.html (8,914 bytes)
5. RE: Electrolytic cleaning of metal (score: 1): Author: "Greg Gowins" <cartman@dnai.com>; Date: Mon, 18 Oct 1999 08:38:10 -0700; Forgive me for sounding dense, but I'm taking it that the end of the bar that you connect to the positive side also must be out of the solution? If both contacts are in the solution, wouldn't that ju; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01274.html (16,461 bytes)
6. Re: Electrolytic cleaning of metal (score: 1): Author: "Wiedemeyer" <boxweed@thebest.net>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 16:43:04 -0400; No, the bar has to be inside the solution too. What happens is that electrons are sucked off the iron bar and deposited on the part to be cleaned of rust. Removing electrons from iron in the presence; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01328.html (18,365 bytes)
7. Re: Electrolytic cleaning of metal (score: 1): Author: David Christman <dpc@ai.mit.edu>; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 18:14:35 -0400 (EDT); The solution has a resistance. The solution completes the circuit (from the positive connection to ground). The amount of current that flows is inversly proportional to the resistance of the solution; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01331.html (8,100 bytes)
8. Re: Electrolytic cleaning of metal (score: 1): Author: Lancer7676@aol.com; Date: Tue, 19 Oct 1999 19:09:56 EDT; << Don't forget, though, that the amount of current we are talking about here is just a few milleamps, which is not enough to cause the old "radio falling into the bathtub effect". >> Just don't drop; /html/spridgets/1999-10/msg01338.html (7,880 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]