- 1. Email fixed, Back to the torque question (score: 1)
- Author: Bruce Richards <bdrtx@swbell.net>
- Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 09:36:02 -0500
- Sorry Guy's, (and Gals), I believe I fixed the problem. Anyway let me put this out one more time, I'd like to get my engine back together before it hits 100 outside. I was trying to find out the corr
- /html/tigers/2002-05/msg00043.html (7,473 bytes)
- 2. Re: Email fixed, Back to the torque question (score: 1)
- Author: BMcgu22954@aol.com
- Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 11:36:48 EDT
- Yes, that's the correct torque. 18 ft. lbs. is what I use. You're right that it doesn't seem like much, but they're only 5/16" bolts. Put some blue loctite on there too. Bruce McGuire
- /html/tigers/2002-05/msg00044.html (7,037 bytes)
- 3. RE: Email fixed, Back to the torque question (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>
- Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 09:27:30 -0700
- With a stiffer clutch, I'd feel better using grade 8 bolts, which you can torque to 20/25 lb-ft (oiled/dry). Also, use Loctite as Bruce McGuire suggests. Here's a link to some torque specs. http://r
- /html/tigers/2002-05/msg00045.html (7,169 bytes)
- 4. Re: Email fixed, Back to the torque question (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Laifman <SLaifman@SoCal.rr.com>
- Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 11:40:05 -0700
- This is my third attempt at answering you. I hope your E-mail provider is straigtened out, and you do receive this one. I wish I knew everything, or that at least Rootes did. Their are all sorts of
- /html/tigers/2002-05/msg00047.html (7,932 bytes)
- 5. Re: Email fixed, Back to the torque question (score: 1)
- Author: "Tom Witt" <wittsend@jps.net>
- Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 16:48:11 -0700
- Don't be tempted to go beyond the seemingly low torque settings. I made this error and promptly snapped a bolt on a Ranchero. Might I add it was a bolt that could not be extracted by an extraction t
- /html/tigers/2002-05/msg00050.html (8,540 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu