- 1. Re: Engine Setback (score: 1)
- Author: richard jurkowski <lsr_man@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 07:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
- Thanks much. How about the suspension vs. solid thing? Am I better off to stick with the S-10 frame, or is the solid suspension early ford I-beam a better idea?
- /html/land-speed/1999-06/msg00226.html (6,876 bytes)
- 2. Re: Engine Setback (score: 1)
- Author: V4GR@aol.com
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 11:06:00 EDT
- Rich; It is my belief that suspension is a good thing, weather with a beam axle or independent. Turrner and Whittley Stude mod/pick up has the front axle solid to the frame though, and seems all righ
- /html/land-speed/1999-06/msg00227.html (7,685 bytes)
- 3. Re: Engine Setback (score: 1)
- Author: richard jurkowski <lsr_man@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 08:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
- pretty heavy duty stuff, and I agree, don't fix it. On the other hand, from reading between the lines I can tell that you are like me and everybody else in this game - "If it wasn't meant to be tink
- /html/land-speed/1999-06/msg00228.html (8,970 bytes)
- 4. Engine Setback (score: 1)
- Author: "Phillip Landry" <saltracer@hotmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:40:31 -0600
- Went out and measured my son's car. It has the stock 106.5 (1932 ford) wheelbase, so the 15% allowed setback for Street Roadster would be 15.975. The current motor being a V8 has the second from the
- /html/land-speed/2007-01/msg00208.html (8,710 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu