Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Engine\s+Setback\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Engine Setback (score: 1)
Author: richard jurkowski <lsr_man@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 07:35:16 -0700 (PDT)
Thanks much. How about the suspension vs. solid thing? Am I better off to stick with the S-10 frame, or is the solid suspension early ford I-beam a better idea?
/html/land-speed/1999-06/msg00226.html (6,876 bytes)

2. Re: Engine Setback (score: 1)
Author: V4GR@aol.com
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 11:06:00 EDT
Rich; It is my belief that suspension is a good thing, weather with a beam axle or independent. Turrner and Whittley Stude mod/pick up has the front axle solid to the frame though, and seems all righ
/html/land-speed/1999-06/msg00227.html (7,685 bytes)

3. Re: Engine Setback (score: 1)
Author: richard jurkowski <lsr_man@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 1999 08:28:56 -0700 (PDT)
pretty heavy duty stuff, and I agree, don't fix it. On the other hand, from reading between the lines I can tell that you are like me and everybody else in this game - "If it wasn't meant to be tink
/html/land-speed/1999-06/msg00228.html (8,970 bytes)

4. Engine Setback (score: 1)
Author: "Phillip Landry" <saltracer@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2007 19:40:31 -0600
Went out and measured my son's car. It has the stock 106.5 (1932 ford) wheelbase, so the 15% allowed setback for Street Roadster would be 15.975. The current motor being a V8 has the second from the
/html/land-speed/2007-01/msg00208.html (8,710 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu