- 1. Engine block numbers (score: 1)
- Author: "Steve" <tiger.tail7@verizon.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 18:37:34 -0800
- Dear listers out they're, I and a friend took out my motor from my Tiger, it used to have a 280, but when I bought it the owners had said it is a 289 now. These are the numbers C8AE-8015-C is these 2
- /html/tigers/2004-01/msg00071.html (6,858 bytes)
- 2. RE: Engine block numbers (score: 1)
- Author: "ron fraser" <rfraser@bluefrog.biz>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 23:18:47 -0500
- I believe you read the number wrong. The 289 block from '66 to '68 is C6AE-6015-C. The 302 block is C8OE-6015-A or C8AE-6015-B. The cast #6 on the block looks like it is almost closed and may seem t
- /html/tigers/2004-01/msg00072.html (7,786 bytes)
- 3. RE: Engine block numbers (score: 1)
- Author: "Jim Ellis" <hunber@bellsouth.net>
- Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2004 23:23:18 -0800
- I think it is a 195 hp 289 from a 1968 Galaxie... then I could be wrong... depends on if the C at the end means what I think it does. Dear listers out they're, I and a friend took out my motor from m
- /html/tigers/2004-01/msg00073.html (7,138 bytes)
- 4. Re: Engine block numbers (score: 1)
- Author: John Clark <clarkjc@runbox.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 23:51:18 -0500
- Hello Steve, I bet if you clean up the number that it would actually read this: C6AE-6015-C (The sixes look like eights when they are dirty.) If that's the number like I think it is, it's a 289. - Jo
- /html/tigers/2004-01/msg00074.html (6,861 bytes)
- 5. RE: Engine block numbers (score: 1)
- Author: "Bob Palmer" <rpalmer@ucsd.edu>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 22:50:12 -0800
- If you look more closely, I'm sure you will see it's 6015, not 8015, and it's nominally a 289 block made in the Windsor Ontario plant. Later in the '68 production run, they ran out of your casting a
- /html/tigers/2004-01/msg00075.html (7,448 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu