Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Engines\,\s+and\s+assorted\s+nonsense\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Engines\,\s+and\s+assorted\s+nonsense\.\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. Engines, and assorted nonsense. (score: 1): Author: Chris Thompson <ct@cthompson.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 17:08:34 -0400; Thanks to all that wrote me with condolences and help after my "This means war" thread. I appreciate it. I've spent the past week pondering what it is I plan to do with the B. Here's what I've come u; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg00124.html (10,560 bytes)
2. Re: Engines, and assorted nonsense. (score: 1): Author: Bill Schooler <schooler@erols.com>; Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 17:32:58 -0400; Chris Thompson wrote:This car will be used as a daily driver on all but the worst weather days. (major snip) Chris, As always, IMHO... Bill; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg00128.html (9,043 bytes)
3. Re: Engines, and assorted nonsense. (score: 1): Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>; Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 16:49:51 -0700; Diametrically opposite agendas. DCOE's are a waste of money except for the track and the WOW crowd. REbuild the engine to factory specs for 1967 engines except go for the cross flow head and a torqu; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg00129.html (8,070 bytes)
4. Re: Engines, and assorted nonsense. (score: 1): Author: David Councill <dcouncil@imt.net>; Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2000 16:01:54 -0600; Well, Blake pretty much wrote my sentiments. I'd stick with stock arrangements except for building the engine to 67 specs like Blake said. That is how I rebuilt the 18V engine in my 71BGT - I used th; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg00131.html (8,690 bytes)
5. Re: Engines, and assorted nonsense. (score: 1): Author: Chris Thompson <ct@cthompson.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 20:21:18 -0400; OK, OK, you caught me. Poor terminology. I typed that as I was sitting listening to a droning speakerphone, pretending to be a valid part of a pointless conference call. Perhaps I should have said "I; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg00137.html (10,180 bytes)
6. RE: Engines, and assorted nonsense. (score: 1): Author: "Larry Hoy" <larryhoy@prodigy.net>; Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 20:30:32 -0600; Sounds like a good decision. The 1967 engine is considered to be one of the best setups. Of course you can always ... hehehe. The 67 has a little higher compression than some other years, and has ve; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg00140.html (9,057 bytes)
7. Re: Engines, and assorted nonsense. (score: 1): Author: Chris Thompson <ct@cthompson.com>; Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2000 22:50:38 -0400; My next one will be a 76+ that I can just bolt the V8 into. And the chrome bumper mod, of course. When I get to that point, I'll ask where the line is drawn. I assume the Bentley and Haynes manuals c; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg00145.html (10,213 bytes)
8. Re: Engines, and assorted nonsense. (score: 1): Author: "Richard Spurling" <hobbes@senet.com.au>; Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 12:56:21 +0930; Mine came with the DGV. I took it off and put twin SUs on it and it was a completely different car - more torque, more top end, better all round. IMHO, the DGV is a waste of time and effort unless y; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg00147.html (10,024 bytes)
9. Re: Engines, and assorted nonsense. (score: 1): Author: WSpohn4@aol.com; Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 00:07:05 EDT; quote I agree - the DGV is indeed a waste of time unless you have a late RBB with servo and can't fit amything else. Right and wrong - the advantages at top end are much more than 'not much' At the R; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg00154.html (9,910 bytes)
10. Re: Engines, and assorted nonsense. (score: 1): Author: Chris Attias <cattias@cats.ucsc.edu>; Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2000 09:20:04 -0700; IMHO, I wouldn't mess with a cross flow head unless you want the "gee whiz factor" when opening the bonnet/hood. Rather expensive, and I haven't seen any airflow or dyno data that support it's superi; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg00181.html (10,816 bytes)
11. Re: Engines, and assorted nonsense. (score: 1): Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>; Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 23:29:58 -0700; <<<snip>>> Listers: Doesn't that make some of us feel old! I can remember back in 1977 when I first drove a fuel injected Datsun 810 Maxima and there were mostly full service gas stations. Young kids; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg00223.html (8,743 bytes)
12. Re: Engines, and assorted nonsense. (score: 1): Author: Chris Kotting <ckotting@core.com>; Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 08:14:30 -0400; I was at a local parts yard this past weekend, and spotted a pair of HUGE SUs sitting in the mud. I retrieved them and took them back to the office to be put away safely. Just for fun, I pretended ig; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg00230.html (9,546 bytes)
13. Re: Engines, and assorted nonsense. (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 10:41:00 -0700; Yeah, I remember when fuel injection was exotic stuff, limited to "fuelie" 'Vettes and 300SLs. Not even Ferraris had fuel injection. Now my wife's Metro econoslug has it (first "fuelie" car either of; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg00267.html (9,399 bytes)
14. Re: Engines, and assorted nonsense. (score: 1): Author: "David Hill" <Davhill@btinternet.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 19:04:22 +0100; My *other* car is a Tri**ph 2.5 PI, which shares the same mechanical injection as the TR6 PI. First production PI system, designed after F1-proved systems. No electronics, no sensors and it works qu; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg00269.html (9,387 bytes)
15. Re: Engines, and assorted nonsense. (score: 1): Author: Charley & Peggy Robinson <ccrobins@ktc.com>; Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 15:01:15 -0500; Hay Max, Whatinell do you mean by "fuelie?" I had a 'Vette with the Rochester injector, it burned pump gas. A guy I used to hang out with when I was in the Navy had a '57 Chevy Bel Aire 2-dr hardtop; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg00292.html (8,288 bytes)
16. Re: Engines, and assorted nonsense. (score: 1): Author: Bud Krueger <bkrueger@ici.net>; Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 17:13:02 -0400; I seem to recall that the last American vehicle built with a carburetor was a Jeep. -- Bud Krueger http://home.ici.net/~bkrueger/ 52TD 77MGB; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg00298.html (8,713 bytes)
17. Re: Engines, and assorted nonsense. (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2000 15:33:00 -0700; Yeah, that's what I meant, the fuel-injected ones. I've heard 'em called that, though I admit that usually means "non-pump-gas" in drag racing terms. Charley & Peggy Robinson had this to say: -- Max; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg00302.html (8,567 bytes)
18. Re: Engines, and assorted nonsense. (score: 1): Author: David Tulchinsky <tulch@ccsalpha3.nrl.navy.mil>; Date: Fri, 6 Oct 2000 08:21:18 -0400; What do you consider American?? I have an '86 Chevy Nova, that has a carb. This generation of Nova's had carbs till at least 88. I don't recall if the next generation did. Now, is it American?? Well; /html/mgs/2000-10/msg00344.html (7,993 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]