Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*F\.I\.\s+Tech\s+$was\s+BSFC$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*F\.I\.\s+Tech\s+$was\s+BSFC$\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. F.I. Tech (was BSFC) (score: 1): Author: "3liter" <saltfever@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 20:55:15 -0700; Dave said (snip... "Atomization is everything when trying to make HP. It is not good to go big on injector size and run low pressure this makes for poor atomization and you are screwed before you eve; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00515.html (8,435 bytes)
2. Re: F.I. Tech (was BSFC) (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 04:43:36 -0400; Think of what we are trying to do here. We are burning the fuel.. With finer drops you have more surface area. To make an analogy as painfully simple as possible .. would you rather start a camp fire; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00519.html (9,411 bytes)
3. Re: F.I. Tech (was BSFC) (score: 1): Author: Nt788@aol.com; Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:42:12 EDT; << When I have played around with mechanical FI I have always used small nozzles >> Did you ever plug them? jack; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00524.html (7,634 bytes)
4. RE: F.I. Tech (was BSFC) (score: 1): Author: "3liter" <saltfever@comcast.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 02:02:58 -0700; Dave said: Think of what we are trying to do here. We are burning the fuel.. With finer drops you have more surface area. As rpm goes up the drops have to be finer or you will be passing a lot of unb; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00553.html (8,665 bytes)
5. Re: F.I. Tech (was BSFC) (score: 1): Author: "Jim Dincau" <jdincau@qnet.com>; Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 12:02:05 -0700; Do liquids ever get into the same problem as solids? As in the flame front in coal dust expanding so rapidly it ends up as an explosion? Jim fuel..; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00562.html (8,036 bytes)
6. Re: F.I. Tech (was BSFC) (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2003 16:27:34 -0400; Not me on the dyno but there sure was opportunity enough to do that if you got some dirt in the system.. Dave; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00566.html (7,974 bytes)
7. Re: F.I. Tech (was BSFC) (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 03:38:21 -0400; To be honest i was thinking about that scenario while i was typing the previous message. There probably is a point where it could get too fine if it would stay that way. Also explosions all have a ti; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00581.html (9,006 bytes)
8. Re: F.I. Tech (was BSFC) (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 03:46:29 -0400; With what little i know about chemistry, i was under the assumption that combustion was exothermic by definition. You get more energy out than you put in. If this were not true you would have to have; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00582.html (8,555 bytes)
9. RE: F.I. Tech (was BSFC) (score: 1): Author: "Waldron, James" <James.Waldron@CWUSA.COM>; Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:21:00 -0400; Isn't combustion a kind of thing where a fuel is combined with an oxidant and a flame front travels across the mixture? (But the flame front can travel 'really fast' so that it may seem like an expl; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00590.html (8,222 bytes)
10. RE: F.I. Tech (was BSFC) (score: 1): Author: "Waldron, James" <James.Waldron@CWUSA.COM>; Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 12:36:56 -0400; Thanks! (I knew someone here would know) Jim. W The three instances are; Combustion, relatively slow burning on the surface, gasoline Deflagration, propagation with a flame front, smokeless gun powd; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00594.html (8,118 bytes)
11. Re: F.I. Tech (was BSFC) (score: 1): Author: Dave Dahlgren <ddahlgren@snet.net>; Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 14:12:22 -0400; Define 'Instantanious throughout time wise...' http://www.hull.ac.uk/php/maspd/galleries_micro/speedphoto/speedphoto.html http://www.cordin.com/images.html Dave; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00597.html (8,513 bytes)
12. RE: F.I. Tech (was BSFC) (score: 1): Author: "Albaugh, Neil" <albaugh_neil@ti.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:32:44 -0500; "Detonation, instantaneous throughout, dynamite" Just to split hairs: <1,000 m/s flame front velocity = low explosive (black powder, coal dust, gasoline/air, etc)-- (burns) C4, etc)-- (detonates) Reg; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00600.html (8,645 bytes)
13. RE: F.I. Tech (was BSFC) (score: 1): Author: <Dale.Clay@mdhelicopters.com>; Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:31:40 -0700; Cool links, Dave. Dale C Define 'Instantanious throughout time wise...' http://www.hull.ac.uk/php/maspd/galleries_micro/speedphoto/speedphoto.html http://www.cordin.com/images.html Dave -- The inform; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00606.html (8,588 bytes)
14. Re: F.I. Tech (was BSFC) (score: 1): Author: "The Weldons" <2weldons@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 20:48:01 -0700; I have very limited nitro experience (Doug King's arduns) so I may not be offering anything useful. Relative to fuel atomization I suspect that whatever is right for gasoline or methanol might not ne; /html/land-speed/2003-09/msg00644.html (8,596 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]