- 1. FCC and Email (score: 1)
- Author: William Chapman <bchapman@adelphia.net>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 17:03:29 -0500
- READ READ READ...........I deleted the long list that accompanied this E-mail. Very Important for the Future of the internet!!!!! READ THIS! READ THIS! READ THIS! READ THIS! Our local telephone compa
- /html/spridgets/1998-01/msg00725.html (9,247 bytes)
- 2. RE: FCC and Email (score: 1)
- Author: "Seippel, Jim J" <Jim.Seippel@siemenscom.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 14:57:15 -0800
- This email has been circulating around the internet for several months now. This issue was settled by the FCC in May 1997 with a decision not to allow local phone companies to charge minute access fe
- /html/spridgets/1998-01/msg00728.html (11,158 bytes)
- 3. Re: FCC and Email (score: 1)
- Author: Randell Jesup <Randell.Jesup@scala.com>
- Date: 22 Jan 1998 18:12:30 -0500
- [snip] This is a false alert. From PCWorld.com: Flood of E-Mail Puzzles FCC by Brian McWilliams, PC World News Radio January 21, 1998 The Federal Communications Commission today was calling "misguide
- /html/spridgets/1998-01/msg00729.html (10,089 bytes)
- 4. Re: FCC and Email (score: 1)
- Author: Gregory Kirk <gkirk@empirenet.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jan 1998 16:29:58 -0800
- This isn;t exactly a hoax, but, this proposal by the RBOC's was rejected by the FCC last year. Please pass this on up the chain, and to anyone you may have forwarded it to. Greg
- /html/spridgets/1998-01/msg00731.html (10,126 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu