Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*FFR\s+in\s+AP\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*FFR\s+in\s+AP\s*$/: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. Re: FFR in AP (score: 1): Author: "Charles Cox" <charles@coastalbay.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 06:36:31 -0700; Maybe they could add a ca-jillion pounds, mandate smaller wheels and run in DP. It works for the Miata which is an AP car, right? Somehow I missed it. How did they get the FFR past the "Intent" rule; /html/ba-autox/2003-07/msg00178.html (8,078 bytes)
2. Re: FFR in AP (score: 1): Author: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 08:56:54 -0700; A strong lobby usually works, and that's probably how the FFR Cobra got into AP. Real Cobras are classed in AP, and putting the FFR Cobras, along with tubeframe Sunbeam Tigers, may help save the clas; /html/ba-autox/2003-07/msg00180.html (8,827 bytes)
3. Re: FFR in AP (score: 1): Author: "James Creasy" <james@thevenom.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 09:17:51 -0700; i think there is (or i remember seeing) also a general rule that replicas run in the class of the original. we are limited by the dimensions and specs of the old-school cobras. that goes for the 7 re; /html/ba-autox/2003-07/msg00181.html (9,632 bytes)
4. Re: FFR in AP (score: 1): Author: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 09:21:05 -0700; Actually, no. There are two P classes where real 7s can run, AP and a heavily ballasted (your words) version in DP. Wetfields, Locost, etc. clones can run in D or E Mod along with Lotus 7s. According; /html/ba-autox/2003-07/msg00182.html (11,092 bytes)
5. RE: FFR in AP (score: 1): Author: "Escano, Arnold (MP)" <aescano@guidant.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:02:24 -0700; Is there a way to have a AP split Class? like by liters? APo (over)APu (under) and have each split class have their own classified rules? arnold Actually, no. There are two P classes where real 7s ca; /html/ba-autox/2003-07/msg00184.html (11,466 bytes)
6. Re: FFR in AP (score: 1): Author: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:14:52 -0700; This sort of goes along with what James suggested yesterday (I think), to have a small-engined, lightweight class other than DP, plus the present AP. I doubt this would happen, since the SEB doesn't; /html/ba-autox/2003-07/msg00185.html (13,395 bytes)
7. Re: FFR in AP (score: 1): Author: "Anthony Tabacco" <tony@atarchitects.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 10:35:51 -0700; "lurking Turners"? What next, buroughing Borgwards? those; /html/ba-autox/2003-07/msg00186.html (7,621 bytes)
8. Re: FFR in AP (score: 1): Author: "John F. Kelly Jr." <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 23:38:30 -0400; Message text written by "James Creasy" "i think there is (or i remember seeing) also a general rule that replicas run in the class of the original. we are limited by the dimensions and specs of the o; /html/ba-autox/2003-07/msg00204.html (8,741 bytes)
9. RE: FFR in AP (score: 1): Author: "John F. Kelly Jr." <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 23:43:46 -0400; Message text written by "Escano, Arnold (MP)" " Is there a way to have a AP split Class? like by liters? APo (over)APu (under) and have each split class have their own classified rules? arnold " -- E; /html/ba-autox/2003-07/msg00205.html (8,213 bytes)
10. Re: FFR in AP (score: 1): Author: "John F. Kelly Jr." <76067.1750@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 11:57:02 -0400; Message text written by "Charles Cox" " Somehow I missed it. How did they get the FFR past the "Intent" rule of the cars having to be based on production cars produced in quantities of no less than 3; /html/ba-autox/2003-07/msg00277.html (9,419 bytes)
11. FW: FFR in AP (score: 1): Author: David Borden <david.j.borden@direcway.com>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:23:18 -0700; the Mustang). >:) -- - Our power to weight ratio is about 6.2:1 with driver. The car weighs 2175 wet with no ballast. To keep things in perspective, we have been developing these cars seriously for; /html/ba-autox/2003-07/msg00290.html (10,034 bytes)
12. Re: FFR in AP (score: 1): Author: "Pat Kelly" <lollipop487@comcast.net>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:25:39 -0700; Looks like the SEB should be worrying about BP rather than AP! --; /html/ba-autox/2003-07/msg00291.html (10,966 bytes)
13. Re: FFR in AP (score: 1): Author: "Lolita Adrien" <lomike@earthlink.net>; Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2003 20:44:55 -0700; If someone was really creative, I think Sooooo...... Does your definition of "creative" encompass collecting parts after dark? ;-) MJ; /html/ba-autox/2003-07/msg00292.html (7,664 bytes)
14. Re: FFR in AP (score: 1): Author: Smokerbros@aol.com; Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2003 00:08:26 EDT; BP and AP are BOTH in danger. Due to the time required to implement a change, it would take until 2005 for the axe to fall. Both classes need to make (or exceed) the minimum entry numbers at the Nati; /html/ba-autox/2003-07/msg00293.html (7,535 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 14
Page: [1]