Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*FOT\s+patches\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*FOT\s+patches\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. FOT patches (score: 1): Author: Ted Schumacher <tedtsimx@q1.net>; Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 12:25:27 -0500; When the FOT logo was shrunk down to do the patch, the words "Amici Triumph I" at the bottom of the patch just looked like a bunch of letters instead of the words. We have found a solution -- putting; /html/fot/2002-04/msg00050.html (7,014 bytes)
2. Re: FOT patches (score: 1): Author: BillDentin@aol.com; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 12:24:55 EST; Ted (read Joe/Greg): Isn't it 'Amici Triumphi'? Bill Dentinger; /html/fot/2002-04/msg00051.html (6,884 bytes)
3. Re: FOT patches (score: 1): Author: "" <greenman62@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2002 18:54:27; Absolutely!!! Greg Petrolati Champaign, Illinois 1962 TR4 (CT4852L) That's not a leak... My car's just marking its territory... _________________________________________________________________ Join; /html/fot/2002-04/msg00053.html (7,741 bytes)
4. FOT patches (score: 1): Author: Ted Schumacher <tedtsimx@q1.net>; Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2002 12:38:37 -0500; We have 54 confirmed FOT patch orders. We must have at least 100 confirmed orders if we are to do the patches. If you have not yet ordered, please do so as soon as possible as we are ready to start p; /html/fot/2002-02/msg00099.html (7,030 bytes)
5. FOT patches (score: 1): Author: Ted Schumacher <tedtsimx@q1.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 09:26:57 -0500; We are ready to do the FOT patches. We need to know if you would like the "FOT" in Old English script at the bottom of the patch. The first t-shirts we had the "FOT" in Old English script and the sec; /html/fot/2002-02/msg00153.html (7,057 bytes)
6. Re: FOT patches (score: 1): Author: "" <greenman62@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 14:25:40; NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!! Respectfully, The designer Greg Petrolati Champaign, Illinois 1962 TR4 (CT4852L) That's not a leak... My car's just marking its territory... ____________; /html/fot/2002-02/msg00154.html (7,968 bytes)
7. Re: FOT patches (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 08:09:11 -0700; I think that the size would demand that a Block font would be more readable. Joe; /html/fot/2002-02/msg00155.html (6,879 bytes)
8. Re: FOT patches (score: 1): Author: "Mike Munson" <fasttrs@mindspring.com>; Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 12:51:18 -0500; Doesn't matter to me . What are the patches going to say and look like? Mike Munson Atlanta -- Original Message -- From: "Ted Schumacher" <tedtsimx@q1.net> To: <FOT@autox.team.net> Sent: Thursday, Fe; /html/fot/2002-02/msg00156.html (7,667 bytes)
9. FOT Patches (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 16:55:17 -0700; A Triumph enthusiast Ralph Janelli is in the business of doing custom embroidery work on clothing and I recently inquired about doing some FOT patches. He said that 5" was the largest he can do so I; /html/fot/2002-01/msg00176.html (7,318 bytes)
10. RE: FOT Patches (score: 1): Author: "Brad Eells" <bradlnss@lightspeed.net>; Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 21:10:49 -0800; I would be interested. I would also be interested in a standard 3" round patch that can have many applications. I am an old Boy Scout patch collector. The spec I think you would be looking for is a; /html/fot/2002-01/msg00177.html (7,393 bytes)
11. Re: FOT Patches (score: 1): Author: "Bill Sohl" <billsohl@mindspring.com>; Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 08:35:21 -0500; I'd be interested in one for sure. I'd also agree with another poster that perhaps a 3" or 4" may be more practical. I'd buy one of each if they were available. Bill Sohl embroidery work on clothing; /html/fot/2002-01/msg00179.html (7,922 bytes)
12. Re: FOT Patches (score: 1): Author: Ted Schumacher <tedtsimx@q1.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 09:30:46 -0500; since we are also in this business, may we quote as well? 3" patches are thenorm. a 5" patch is too large for a front - say left chest - application and too small to be used as a back patch. back pat; /html/fot/2002-01/msg00180.html (9,062 bytes)
13. Re: FOT Patches (score: 1): Author: Joe Curry <spitlist@gte.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 08:42:55 -0700; Because many people also were interested in a 3" patch, I have requested a quote on that size as well. If anyone who already sent a reply on only the 5 inch patches is interested in 3" ones as well,; /html/fot/2002-01/msg00181.html (8,483 bytes)
14. Re: FOT Patches (score: 1): Author: TRBILBO@aol.com; Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 12:34:54 EST; I've done dozens of show patches in the past and would recommend a 3 inch patch for shoulder of the suit or upper front chest max. 3 inch is also useable for hats and for shirts (althouygh shirts are; /html/fot/2002-01/msg00183.html (7,365 bytes)
15. Re: FOT Patches (score: 1): Author: "Jim Hill" <jrhill@chorus.net>; Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 12:07:37 -0600; With respect to patches to be used on driver's suits, what is the conventional wisdom on whether they should be made of flame-resistant material? I've heard it said that the thread should NOT be flam; /html/fot/2002-01/msg00184.html (8,065 bytes)
16. FOT patches (score: 1): Author: GuyotLeonF@aol.com; Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 12:06:35 EST; Joe, I am interested in two 3 inch patches. I would have to send U.S. currency directly to you, but they may be mailed to me at my fiancC)es mailing address Stateside. Please let me know idc, how you; /html/fot/2002-01/msg00192.html (8,072 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]