- 1. Factory Distributor Swap (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Guinness <rjglaw@swbell.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 09:39:45 -0500
- Does anyone have the Tech Bulletins for the factory "recall" to swap of the internal amplifier "Opus" distributors for the CEI distributors. I think they were: and Thanks. Robert Guinness '77 MGB
- /html/mgs/2003-10/msg00407.html (6,931 bytes)
- 2. Re: Factory Distributor Swap (score: 1)
- Author: "Telewest \(PH\)" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 16:04:09 +0100
- *Was* there a recall? I thought it was 'replace on failure', with the 'Opeless 45DE4 eventually being phased out by the factory.
- /html/mgs/2003-10/msg00408.html (7,194 bytes)
- 3. Re: Factory Distributor Swap (score: 1)
- Author: Robert Guinness <rjglaw@swbell.net>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 13:48:28 -0500
- I believe that you are correct that there was no factory recall, that's why I used the term in quotes. I do know that the CEI was a failure replacement for the Opus. The following website shows two
- /html/mgs/2003-10/msg00413.html (8,137 bytes)
- 4. Re: Factory Distributor Swap (score: 1)
- Author: Paul Root <proot@iaces.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2003 14:57:05 -0500
- The stuff I've read about SU swaps for the ZS car often mentions swapping out the dizzy for a 25D or points based 45D to get the more performance based advance curve with the weights. But I haven't r
- /html/mgs/2003-10/msg00415.html (9,075 bytes)
- 5. Re: Factory Distributor Swap (score: 1)
- Author: "Telewest \(PH\)" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2003 09:46:41 +0100
- Hi Robert, It is generally reckoned that the earlier distributors gave better performance as they weren't concerned with emissions, but there were 24 (at my count) different distributors used over th
- /html/mgs/2003-10/msg00437.html (9,613 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu