Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fast\s+Lane\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fast\s+Lane\s*$/: 33 ]

Total 33 documents matching your query.

21. RE: Fast Lane (score: 1): Author: "Freiburger, David" <David.Freiburger@primedia.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 03:11:18 -0500; I vote for requiring people to get their licenses at other events before they come to Speed Week. This will reduce the time in line, at least on the short course, because it will eliminate the people; /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00214.html (9,729 bytes)
22. Re: Fast Lane (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 05:41:02 -0500; Obviously the ECTA would support that idea... but El Mirage would become a mad house... ( not that it isn't already ) How about a secondary course just for lic. passes? set up for the first 3 days of; /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00216.html (8,347 bytes)
23. Fast Lane (score: 1): Author: "3 liter" <saltfever@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 04:32:38 -0700; In the many years I have been at the starting line I have just not seen the problems that are being mentioned in this thread. Occasionally, there is a hold up and Jim Jensen gives the other car the O; /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00218.html (9,248 bytes)
24. Re: Fast Lane (score: 1): Author: "Tom Bryant" <saltracer@awwwsome.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 08:05:54 -0700; I think that you are on to something. There could be a seperate course for licensing and for that matter tuneup. I remember the days when we had a warmup area that went backwards from the starting l; /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00221.html (8,636 bytes)
25. Re: Fast Lane (score: 1): Author: "Ed Weldon" <23.weldon@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 08:30:02 -0700; Keith and others--I like your third course idea for license passes and practice. Following resources are needed: 1. More salt real estate. More support for Save the Salt. Send your $. 2. SCTA/BNI Pra; /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00222.html (9,888 bytes)
26. RE: Fast Lane (score: 1): Author: "Freiburger, David" <David.Freiburger@primedia.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 11:10:48 -0500; IMO, the third course does not have a good return for the investment in time, people or equipment. My suggestion about licensing elsewhere has one big perk that a third course will not solve: it cuts; /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00223.html (9,937 bytes)
27. Re: Fast Lane (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 11:29:34 -0500; I agree with Lic elsewhere when possible... thou many folks would think it's elitist and poo poo us for it... The whole gig is that we're looking at the big picture of this and not looking at what th; /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00225.html (8,827 bytes)
28. Re: Fast Lane (score: 1): Author: "Keith Turk" <kturk@ala.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 11:38:29 -0500; Dan I attended... listened.. ( and most likely quit when it didn't pertain to me ) what was the purpose of the 1st mile light... so that folks could turn off at the two during lic. runs? Good idea...; /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00227.html (7,878 bytes)
29. Re: Fast Lane (score: 1): Author: "Ed Weldon" <23.weldon@comcast.net>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 09:54:38 -0700; David and others-- We already can license elseware (WOS and ECTA) I think SCTA has an ongoing effort to approve other LSR venues for licensing. Banning licensing, even low speed licensing like "D" an; /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00232.html (9,486 bytes)
30. Re: Fast Lane (score: 1): Author: "Freiburger, David" <David.Freiburger@primedia.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 12:00:03 -0500; Two long courses will bring a lot of fighting over which one is "better" and you'd need a system to control who runs which one and when. At a minimum, qualifiers on course 1 should be required to bac; /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00233.html (7,957 bytes)
31. Re: Fast Lane (score: 1): Author: "Rich Fox" <v4gr@rcn.com>; Date: Sat, 14 Oct 2006 11:23:04 -0700; I may as well have an opinion along with everyone else. It seems to me that it is apparent that there is a finite number of entry's that can run at Speedweek before the experience deteriorates unacce; /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00241.html (8,969 bytes)
32. Re: Fast Lane (score: 1): Author: "John Burk" <joyseydevil@comcast.net>; Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 15:41:18 -0400; I counted the 2006 Speedweek long course runs : Sunday 145 Monday 121 Tuesday 108 Wednesday 71 It seems to me all that's needed to handle more vehicles is class stagering and maybe another day of run; /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00332.html (7,433 bytes)
33. Re: Fast Lane (score: 1): Author: James Tone <gmc6power@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:38:37 -0700 (GMT-07:00); I don't know what stagering means, but as far as I can see guys who came off the trailer and set records would be done on Saturday and Sunday. There were 97 runs on Saturday with many multiple runs u; /html/land-speed/2006-10/msg00333.html (8,616 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 33
Page: [1] [2]