Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fiero\s+classing\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Fiero\s+classing\s*$/: 16 ]

Total 16 documents matching your query.

1. Re: Fiero classing (score: 1): Author: Scott Meyers <solo2@uswest.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 06:55:01 -0700; The MR-2 is 2650# and 135 HP. Both are mid engine. Are they really that different mechanically? It seems 5hp and 150# is not statistically significant in the grand scope of classing. Scott Meyers; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00839.html (7,498 bytes)
2. Re: Fiero classing (score: 1): Author: "David Hawkins" <otgrouch@twosrus.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 09:10:28 -0500; of I think Mr. Ryan would be much more happy with a 5 speed in his Fiero. I've run against V6 Fieros that were pretty closely matched to the NA MR2. It takes a VERY good driver to wring the best per; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00842.html (8,329 bytes)
3. Re: Fiero classing (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 06:44:41 -0700; But the point remains: a whole class worth of difference? I don't think so. The ES car on the other hand may need revisiting. For what its worth, I have seen MAYBE one letter with action requested on; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00844.html (8,805 bytes)
4. Re: Fiero classing (score: 1): Author: "George Ryan" <quad4fiero@webzone.net>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 11:40:52 -0500; I could put a 5 speed in an 85 SE (one of which I currently own), or GT V6 Fieros, or an early 86 for that matter, but then i would have to run in CSP!! I do agree about the MR2, but the subject in D; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00860.html (9,581 bytes)
5. Re: Fiero classing (score: 1): Author: Sam Strano <strano@stranoparts.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 13:07:08 -0400; Or you could race an 88 Formula (which is the best of the bunch). I can tell ya this much. I was teaching an Evolution school back in April or May in Cincinnati. For the life of me I can't remember t; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00862.html (9,432 bytes)
6. Re: Fiero classing (score: 1): Author: "Jay Mitchell" <jemitchell@compuserve.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 12:06:19 -0500; Nationals. Todd Rupp, in 1990 or 1991. He definitely trophied, he may have won, in CS in an 88. I have no idea how well a primo 88 (the only model with much of a chance) could do now (they're in CS,; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00863.html (7,999 bytes)
7. Re: Fiero classing (score: 1): Author: Jkinser77@aol.com; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 14:05:00 EDT; << Or you could race an 88 Formula (which is the best of the bunch). Go back to 88, 89, 90 and look at Erik Eckman's 88. He did rather well in Solo 2, and I did drive his for a few events in pro solo; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00870.html (8,660 bytes)
8. Re: Fiero classing (score: 1): Author: Mari L Clements <mrndr2@juno.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 15:05:12 -0700; Uh...only if you have a 93+. 91 & 92 were both 130 HP. Mine weighs 2655 in competition ready trim, but each one varies a little (options and such, you know). mlc '91 MR2 NA --I take no responsibilit; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00873.html (8,483 bytes)
9. Re: Fiero classing (score: 1): Author: "David Hawkins" <otgrouch@twosrus.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 14:48:24 -0500; Here we go again with the 'I' classing. So by that logic, all pre 86 Fieros with a V6 should be in one class due to the 4spd and the others in a different class because of the 5spd? The 1.6 Miata nu; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00877.html (9,545 bytes)
10. Re: Fiero classing (score: 1): Author: "Otto Crosser" <ottocrosser@hotmail.com>; Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2000 17:05:13 EDT; Hey Jean, What ever happened to Eric anyway? Otto In response to:: -- << Or you could race an 88 Formula (which is the best of the bunch). The Fiero has NEVER in the past decade trophied at the Natio; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00884.html (9,303 bytes)
11. Re: Fiero classing (score: 1): Author: JonesMB <jonesmb@ziplink.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 20:27:40 -0500; in that case my 2650# 130lb-ft Type R is toast :-) jmb; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00957.html (8,383 bytes)
12. Re: Fiero classing (score: 1): Author: "George Ryan" <quad4fiero@webzone.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 06:55:54 -0500; There is no T classing (whatever that means) mentioned in my letters. I was simply responding to the letter I received about needing a 5 speed - it wasn't made those years (I personally think the 4 s; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00964.html (11,268 bytes)
13. Fw: Fiero classing (score: 1): Author: "George Ryan" <quad4fiero@webzone.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 08:31:18 -0500; A decade ago, the Fiero was fairly classed. Eckman et al did quite well with this marque!! Even when the car was moved to CS it was competitive, not trophy material in Solo particularly, but competit; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00966.html (11,196 bytes)
14. Re: Fiero classing (score: 1): Author: "George Ryan" <quad4fiero@webzone.net>; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 10:52:28 -0500; One final point Andy Bettencourt states below that he has seen MAYBE one letter addressing the inequities of classing the 90hp 2650lb Fiero "Iron Duke" 4 cylinder in ES. How many letters does it take; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00969.html (11,322 bytes)
15. Fw: Fiero classing (score: 1): Author: rjohnson@friendlynet.com; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 14:16:50 -0500; Let me get this right - the 4cyl. Fiero isn't competitive in E/S? So this means we put a mid-engine 2 seat car in H/S? Incredible. . . . . . Roger Johnson (Amazed); /html/autox/2000-07/msg00973.html (11,085 bytes)
16. Re: Fiero classing (score: 1): Author: Andrew_Bettencourt@kingston.com; Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2000 11:07:07 -0700; Like I had said before: If one letter comes through with valid points and a benefit to the club, then one letter is all that is needed to get the powers that be to start a new thought process. If it; /html/autox/2000-07/msg00976.html (11,748 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 16
Page: [1]