Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Finned\s+8\s+qt\.\s+Oil\s+Sump\s+VS\.\s+Oil\s+Cooler\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Finned 8 qt. Oil Sump VS. Oil Cooler (score: 1)
Author: "Jerry Shaw" <jcs104@home.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 09:32:26 -0400
Upon sending a query to a member of 6pack (I think it was Kyle Rice) about his performance mods, he suggested that the aluminum oil sump from Racetorations was superior to an oil cooler, since it inv
/html/6pack/2001-08/msg00233.html (8,685 bytes)

2. RE: Finned 8 qt. Oil Sump VS. Oil Cooler (score: 1)
Author: "Kyle K. Rice" <kkrice1@email.msn.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2001 19:12:42 -0700
Yes it was me. I have no test results to support the reduction in oil temp. when using the finned alloy oil sump, but I do know that I have no heat problems (I did before the change) and with the ex
/html/6pack/2001-08/msg00251.html (9,515 bytes)

3. RE: Finned 8 qt. Oil Sump VS. Oil Cooler (score: 1)
Author: William Whitmoyer <wwhitmoyer@samsonite.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 10:29:46 -0400
I fitted a Racetorations alloy sump in 1997. With no other modifications to the cooling system, the car did run cooler. With the extra oil capacity (I used Mobil 1 15w50 before and after, as syntheti
/html/6pack/2001-08/msg00264.html (9,064 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu