Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Forbes\s+article\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Forbes\s+article\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Forbes article (score: 1): Author: "Chris Thompson" <cthompson@rrinc.com>; Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 20:40:38 -0400; For those of you who might have missed this on the latest Forbes magazine site - a mention of the Sunbeam Tiger! Article written by a friend of mine who happens to own a Jaguar lightweight, not a Tig; /html/tigers/2002-05/msg00264.html (6,888 bytes)
2. Re: Forbes article (score: 1): Author: twojohnsons@cox.net; Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 08:51:11 -0400; A shrunken Ferrari--get real. A shrunken T-bird, maybe. Like no Ferrari I've ever seen. AJ; /html/tigers/2002-05/msg00276.html (7,134 bytes)
3. Re: Forbes article (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <larry.p@erols.com>; Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 10:08:59 -0400; Chris, thanks for the heads up, but what a stupid choice for voting. They list the various cars, then omit the chance to vote for the Tiger and Healey, in favor of voting for a Rover. Its like saying; /html/tigers/2002-05/msg00277.html (8,091 bytes)
4. FW: Forbes article (score: 1): Author: DavidAdin@mercydurango.org; Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 08:14:51 -0600; Have to agree, the big Healeys were the best "affordable" cars around. There were some good Rovers (well sedans) . . but in the same class as Tigers, E-types (or XK120s), or big Healeys? I doubt it.; /html/tigers/2002-05/msg00278.html (8,950 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]