Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Frame\s+Off\s+Restoration\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Frame\s+Off\s+Restoration\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Frame Off Restoration (score: 1): Author: "Travis Hall" <tigerboy65@hotmail.com>; Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 16:56:57 -0500; I suggest that there is nothing wrong with this phrase when referring to a Tiger restoration, after all, we all know what the phrase implies. Everything was taken off the frame, all components were r; /html/tigers/2005-04/msg00016.html (7,380 bytes)
2. Re: Frame Off Restoration (score: 1): Author: Larry Paulick <lpaulick@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 17:35:57 -0500; The term Frame Off, is OK, if it implies that indeed there was a complete body restoration. Missing chrome on the side, and no Sunbeam lettering is also OK. I do have question re Jackson Barrette. It; /html/tigers/2005-04/msg00017.html (8,505 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]