Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Friday\s+funnies\s+vs\.\s+taste\s*$/: 17 ]

Total 17 documents matching your query.

1. Friday funnies vs. taste (score: 1)
Author: "Keith Pennell" <pennell@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:53:15 -0500
Hello all, This is in regard to our sharing of jokes on Friday. I am certainly far from being a prude and enjoy a good joke as much as anyone, even those which "should not be told in mixed company".
/html/healeys/2005-02/msg00665.html (7,813 bytes)

2. Re: Friday funnies vs. taste (score: 1)
Author: Bill Rister <brister@houston.rr.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:31:45 -0600
/html/healeys/2005-02/msg00668.html (8,050 bytes)

3. Re: Friday funnies vs. taste (score: 1)
Author: "Bob Spidell" <bspidell@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:35:44 -0800
"... off color ones ..." And who decides which ones are "off color?" The thick-skinned among us are nearly impossible to offend, while some might blanch at the word "heck." It's almost nearly imposs
/html/healeys/2005-02/msg00670.html (8,925 bytes)

4. Re: Friday funnies vs. taste (score: 1)
Author: Douglas W Flagg <dwflagg@juno.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:00:40 -0500
I am sure that there are those of us that would find some of the more "off color" funnies appropriate under the right circumstances. Where we know the people and feel comfortable with the situation.
/html/healeys/2005-02/msg00671.html (10,354 bytes)

5. Re: Friday funnies vs. taste (score: 1)
Author: RAHosmer@aol.com
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:06:06 EST
Gentlemen, and Ladies, with all due respect . . . . . . . . Yes, some of the funnies are a bit crude (well, a very few are quite crude) but, I think that, in microcosm, the suggestion that they be dr
/html/healeys/2005-02/msg00673.html (8,413 bytes)

6. Re: Friday funnies vs. taste (score: 1)
Author: "John Soderling" <jsoderling@astound.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 19:17:24 -0800
I agree with you, Keith. Thanks for bringing the issue up. Vrooom vrooom, John
/html/healeys/2005-02/msg00674.html (8,923 bytes)

7. Re: Friday funnies vs. taste (score: 1)
Author: "davidwjones" <davidwjones@cox.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:20:39 -0500
Could not possibly agree more. David W. Jones '62 Mk II BT7 tricarb Cumberland, RI USA Gentlemen, and Ladies, with all due respect . . . . . . . . Yes, some of the funnies are a bit crude (well, a ve
/html/healeys/2005-02/msg00675.html (9,032 bytes)

8. Re: Friday funnies vs. taste (score: 1)
Author: HealeyBN7@aol.com
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:28:04 EST
IMHO - jokes are ..... just jokes. no harm is really intended. use the delete key if they offend you. or just let them run thru you. if you find them dumb, ignore them, funny - enjoy them. offensive?
/html/healeys/2005-02/msg00677.html (9,258 bytes)

9. Re: Friday funnies vs. taste (score: 1)
Author: MBran89793@aol.com
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:29:53 EST
[I say, if you are afraid that you, personally, might be upset by the of a joke, DON'T READ IT. The answer is NOT to censor life for everyone. My .02.] FWIW- "Life is to short to share with those so
/html/healeys/2005-02/msg00678.html (8,342 bytes)

10. Re: Friday funnies vs. taste (score: 1)
Author: "James Lea" <clocks@midcoast.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:46:41 -0500
What is the difference between the "Friday Funnies" and putting on an item "For Sale" In the latter case we agreed that if "For Sale" was in the subject line then those persons not interested in buyi
/html/healeys/2005-02/msg00679.html (8,712 bytes)

11. RE: Friday funnies vs. taste (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Huseman" <ronhuseman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:51:54 -0600
Get a life. If you're offended by the humorous 'Friday' jokes....don't open them? Daa..... R.Huseman
/html/healeys/2005-02/msg00680.html (8,141 bytes)

12. RE: Friday funnies vs. taste (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Huseman" <ronhuseman@sbcglobal.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:55:11 -0600
Amen....I'm about fed up today with over-sensitive, politically-correct, wrapped-too-tight Healey enthusiasts who are afraid of being offended by an intermittent joke mixed in with their grerhead co
/html/healeys/2005-02/msg00681.html (8,362 bytes)

13. Re: Friday funnies vs. taste (score: 1)
Author: Blue One Hundred <healey.nut@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 12:20:52 +0800
I thought one half of the tenet of "freedom of speech" was exercising your right "not to listen," or in this case "not to read." As far as I know no one on this list is a child, so we can't say we ne
/html/healeys/2005-02/msg00683.html (8,378 bytes)

14. RE: Friday funnies vs. taste (score: 1)
Author: "Greg Wilkinson" <gregwilkinson@adelphia.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 20:59:37 -0800
Oddly enough I find this thread worse than the jokes, which I almost always enjoy. Now, where is that delete ke
/html/healeys/2005-02/msg00684.html (7,835 bytes)

15. Re: Friday funnies vs. taste (score: 1)
Author: Gus <mother-ship@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 13:08:13 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Comments like this continue to prove that some Big Healey owners can be so uptight and boring that they portray the whole group as being like them. You guys need to relax and have some fun once in aw
/html/healeys/2005-02/msg00691.html (8,923 bytes)

16. RE: Friday funnies vs. taste (score: 1)
Author: "Joe Farley" <joe@farley.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:10:58 -0800
The FTC (Federal Taste Commission) requires the following warning: The Joke contained in this belated Friday Funny may be offensive to the following groups and or sub groups: Blondes, Those who have
/html/healeys/2005-02/msg00693.html (9,182 bytes)

17. Re: Friday funnies vs. taste (score: 1)
Author: Awgertoo@aol.com
Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 20:24:14 EST
Let's settle this whole thing: I'll volunteer to be the self-appointed and final arbitror of all things humorous and offensive. For my first humorous and non-offensive contribution: What did the duck
/html/healeys/2005-02/msg00699.html (7,615 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu