Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Front\s+Flasher\s+for\s+a\s+67\s+MkI\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*Front\s+Flasher\s+for\s+a\s+67\s+MkI\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. Front Flasher for a 67 MkI (score: 1): Author: Patton Dickson <kpdii@earthlink.net>; Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:04:09 -0500; My 67 MGB Mk I has a clear front flasher lens on the passenger side, and amber/clear front flasher lens on the driver's side. Which is correct? Moss lists both. Thanks Patton /// or try http://www.te; /html/mgs/2002-06/msg00479.html (7,404 bytes)
2. Re: Front Flasher for a 67 MkI (score: 1): Author: Bill Dudley <wdudley4@attbi.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 11:13:37 -0600; My 67 B (mfg in 66) has clear lenses. Bill Dudley 67 MGB Original Owner 74 1/2 MGB GT V8 Project /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive; /html/mgs/2002-06/msg00480.html (7,630 bytes)
3. Re: Front Flasher for a 67 MkI (score: 1): Author: Skye Poier <skye@ffwd.cx>; Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:26:52 -0700; Could be one of those euro/us differences. Have you consulted The Bible? (Clausager's "Original MGB") This book should be in every MG owner's possession http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/1870979; /html/mgs/2002-06/msg00481.html (8,105 bytes)
4. RE: Front Flasher for a 67 MkI (score: 1): Author: Chuck Renner <crenner@dynalivery.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 14:32:00 -0500; Having recently read it, I know that he does state the exact use of the clear and amber front indicators...I just can't remember... /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at h; /html/mgs/2002-06/msg00482.html (7,538 bytes)
5. Re: Front Flasher for a 67 MkI (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 12:41:04 -0700; Without checking Clausager, clear is correct for 66, and they are generally -- Max Heim '66 MGB GHN3L76149 If you're near Mountain View, CA, it's the primer red one with chrome wires /// or try http:; /html/mgs/2002-06/msg00483.html (7,760 bytes)
6. RE: Front Flasher for a 67 MkI (score: 1): Author: "Phil Vanner" <phil@outtech.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 15:00:21 -0500; Unless, of course you don't own a "B," in which case it's an interesting diversion but not a "must." ;-) Phil Vanner '61 Midget --Original Message-- Have you consulted The Bible? (Clausager's "Origin; /html/mgs/2002-06/msg00484.html (7,704 bytes)
7. Re: Front Flasher for a 67 MkI (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@studiolimage.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 13:01:48 -0700; OK, I looked it up. White was correct for North American cars until April 66 (Canada) and December 67 (US). It was also correct for Mk. I's in Italy, if that is relevant. -- Max Heim '66 MGB GHN3L761; /html/mgs/2002-06/msg00485.html (7,941 bytes)
8. Re: Front Flasher for a 67 MkI (score: 1): Author: Bill Dudley <wdudley4@attbi.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 17:04:49 -0600; According to Clausager (p99 - picture p100) "All white lenses, however, were found on cars for the USA, Canda and Italy..." He later states: "From April 66 Canadian cars adpoted the amber indicator l; /html/mgs/2002-06/msg00487.html (8,608 bytes)
9. Re: Front Flasher for a 67 MkI (score: 1): Author: Max Heim <mvheim@attbi.com>; Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2002 16:40:06 -0700; Bill, I found the same passages, but I also looked at the timeline of changes in the back, which specifically said that they changed to all amber in Dec. 67. (quote: "all amber lenses to front indica; /html/mgs/2002-06/msg00490.html (9,794 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]