- 1. Front Parking light (score: 1)
- Author: Barrie Robinson <barrier@bconnex.net>
- Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 16:22:11 -0700
- There is a parking light under the headlight. It has a metal holder which bolts to the body and has the bulb holder fixed to the back. I can get the seal (Moss 164-110) for the lens from LBCarCo but
- /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00412.html (7,305 bytes)
- 2. Re: Front Parking light (score: 1)
- Author: Bullwinkle <yd3@nvc.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 00:04:21 -0500
- I have a Lucas catalog for 1965. It shows that the side marker lamp for the 62-67 cars have a foam pad underneath the base and between the base and the lens use the SAME gasket. In other words two I
- /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00420.html (7,168 bytes)
- 3. Re: Front Parking light (score: 1)
- Author: "Telewest \(PH\)" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 09:11:41 +0100
- Ho ho! /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/majorcool /// Archives at http://www.team.net/archive
- /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00421.html (7,119 bytes)
- 4. Re: Front Parking light (score: 1)
- Author: "R. Martin Rogovein" <rmort@bezeqint.net>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 00:25:19 +0200
- which the seal rubber I'm sure I am opening a can of worms here, but what's wrong with rubber for this seal? My car had the tattered and fragmented remains of what was apparently once a rubber seal
- /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00435.html (8,048 bytes)
- 5. Re: Front Parking light (score: 1)
- Author: "Telewest \(PH\)" <paul.hunt1@blueyonder.co.uk>
- Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2003 09:31:58 +0100
- Should be closed-cell foam about 3/16" thick for its greater compressibility which will make a better seal against water ingress than inner-tube rubber. a just /// or try http://www.team.net/cgi-bin/
- /html/mgs/2003-04/msg00524.html (7,584 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu