- 1. Front bearings (score: 1)
- Author: Glenn Schnittke <glenns@edge.ercnet.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 1996 09:16:19 -0600
- Being in the middle of a front end rebuild on the prim (actually a transfer), I have an opportunity to redo the bearings. The normal setup being such a pain in the ass, I started rethinking the space
- /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00501.html (7,818 bytes)
- 2. Re: Front bearings (score: 1)
- Author: gmccann@pcug.org.au (Graham McCann)
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 10:52:40 +1100
- calculate it? Not so. The correct bearing is conical or tapered (to use the more normal name). Many people throw away the shims and use the 'tight less one castellation' rule. The use of shims was d
- /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00521.html (7,909 bytes)
- 3. Re: Front bearings (score: 1)
- Author: jtilton@vt.edu (Jay Tilton)
- Date: Sat, 20 Jan 1996 00:22:27 +0500
- I don't think I have to worry about understatement when I say "yikes." Please tell me it was a backyard mechanic who did that and not a pro. -- Jay Tilton / jtilton@vt.edu (vt = Virginia Tech) http:
- /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00530.html (6,872 bytes)
- 4. Re: Front bearings (score: 1)
- Author: Glenn Schnittke <glenns@edge.ercnet.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 1996 08:13:49 -0600
- *Stuff deleted* I guess you could say I use the "tight less slightly less than one half castellation rule". Tapered (or conical - not to be confused with comical) bearings are self-centering. As lon
- /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00547.html (8,449 bytes)
- 5. Re: Front bearings (score: 1)
- Author: todd@nutria.nrlssc.navy.mil (Todd Mullins)
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 1996 08:51:53 -0600 (CST)
- Actually, I don't think he meant intentional welding, I think he was speaking of the welding that occurs when driving on an exploded bearing. I took that course a couple of summers ago. Long story, e
- /html/mgs/1996-01/msg00549.html (7,201 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu